首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >Subjective characterization of nerve sparing predicts recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy: defining the utility of a nerve sparing grading system.
【24h】

Subjective characterization of nerve sparing predicts recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy: defining the utility of a nerve sparing grading system.

机译:保留神经的主观特征可预测根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能的恢复:定义了保留神经分级系统的用途。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common technique for managing prostate cancer. Concern regarding functional outcomes in patients prompted the development of nerve sparing to improve recovery of erectile function. AIM: To assess if a cumulative nerve damage grading system is a more precise predictor of recovery of erectile function as compared to the current "all-or-none" grading system. METHODS: Baseline demographic, medical history, and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-erectile function domain (EFD) scores were collected. At the time of RP, patients were assigned a nerve sparing score (NSS) by their surgeon for each neurovascular bundle (left and right) to assess the quality of intraoperative nerve sparing (1-complete preservation, 4-complete resection). Patients completed IIEF questionnaires at 24 months after RP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Group comparisons and multiple regression analyses were used to test the association between the NSS and IIEF-EFD scores for patients with preoperative EFD scores >/= 24. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were included in this analysis. Mean age for patients was 59, and 62% of patients had at least one comorbidity. Baseline EFD scores were comparable between all NSS assignments. At 24 months, EFD scores were reduced by 7.2, 11.6, 13.9, and 15.4 points for patients with NSS grades of 2, 3, 4, and 5-8, respectively (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated lower NSS predicted recovery of erectile function at 24 months (P = 0.001), as did age (P = 0.001) and baseline EFD score (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Our data support the adoption of a subjectively assigned NSS to more precisely predict erectile function outcomes and suggest that even minor nerve trauma significantly impairs the recovery of erectile function after procedures classically regarded as having achieved bilateral nerve sparing. Further studies are needed to identify the optimal NSS system.
机译:简介:根治性前列腺切除术(RP)是治疗前列腺癌的常用技术。对患者功能结局的关注促使神经保护发展,以改善勃起功能的恢复。目的:评估与目前的“全有或全无”分级系统相比,累积神经损伤分级系统是否更准确地预测勃起功能的恢复。方法:收集基线人口统计,病史和国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)-勃起功能域(EFD)评分。在进行RP时,外科医生为每个神经血管束(左和右)分配了神经保留分数(NSS),以评估术中神经保留的质量(1例保留,4例切除)。 RP后24个月,患者完成了IIEF问卷。主要观察指标:组比较和多元回归分析用于检验术前EFD评分> / = 24的患者的NSS和IIEF-EFD评分之间的相关性。结果:该分析共纳入173例患者。患者的平均年龄为59岁,其中62%的患者患有至少一种合并症。所有NSS作业之间的基准EFD分数均相当。在24个月时,NSS等级分别为2、3、4和5-8的患者的EFD分数分别降低了7.2、11.6、13.9和15.4分(P <0.01)。多变量分析显示,NSS预测的24个月勃起功能恢复较低(P = 0.001),年龄(P = 0.001)和基线EFD评分(P = 0.02)也较低。结论:我们的数据支持采用主观分配的NSS来更精确地预测勃起功能的结果,并提示即使是轻微的神经损伤也可以在经典地认为双侧神经保留的手术后严重损害勃起功能的恢复。为了确定最佳的NSS系统,还需要进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号