首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of school health >Fruit and vegetable distribution program versus a multicomponent program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption: which should be recommended for implementation?
【24h】

Fruit and vegetable distribution program versus a multicomponent program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption: which should be recommended for implementation?

机译:水果和蔬菜分配计划与增加水果和蔬菜消费的多要素计划:应建议实施哪些建议?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Two primary school-based interventions were implemented, aimed at increasing fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption by children, both with proven effectiveness: (1) a free daily F&V distribution scheme for all primary school children and (2) a multicomponent, age-specific program consisting of a classroom curriculum, parental involvement, and an environmental component. This article describes and compares the implementation, evaluation, and potential for adoption of the 2 interventions. METHODS: A total of 48 teachers who worked with either of these programs filled out a questionnaire at the end of the intervention period. Additionally, 24 of the teachers who worked with the multicomponent program filled out periodic monitoring reports during the intervention. RESULTS: Compared to the F&V distribution, the multicomponent program was less fully implemented and that implementation of activities decreased over time. Both programs were evaluated favorably, and about half of the teachers indicated that they were willing to use the program again in the following school year. Teachers who used the multicomponent program experienced more social pressure to implement the program. They rated the program they had used as more complex and risky than the other group rated the distribution program. CONCLUSIONS: The free distribution program has the greatest potential for being adopted by schoolteachers, but that efforts must be made to acquire funding for it. Until these resources are available, the multicomponent program seems to be a good alternative if improved as suggested.
机译:背景:实施了两项以小学为基础的干预措施,旨在增加儿童食用水果和蔬菜(F&V)的方法,两种方法均已证明是行之有效的:(1)免费为所有小学生提供的每日F&V分配方案;(2)多成分,针对特定年龄段的课程,包括课堂课程,家长参与和环境因素。本文介绍并比较了这两种干预措施的实施,评估和潜力。方法:在干预期结束时,总共有48位从事上述两个项目之一的教师填写了问卷。此外,参与该多项目计划的24位教师在干预期间填写了定期监测报告。结果:与F&V分发相比,多组件计划的执行不充分,并且随着时间的推移,活动的执行减少了。两项计划均获得了良好的评价,大约一半的教师表示他们愿意在下学年再次使用该计划。使用多组件程序的教师在实施该程序时承受了更大的社会压力。他们对他们曾经使用过的程序进行了评估,认为该程序比另一组对分发程序的评估更为复杂和风险更大。结论:免费分发计划最有可能被学校教师采用,但必须努力为其筹集资金。在这些资源可用之前,如果按照建议进行改进,多组件程序似乎是一个不错的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号