首页> 外文期刊>Public Health Nutrition >Increasing children's fruit and vegetable consumption: distribution or a multicomponent programme?
【24h】

Increasing children's fruit and vegetable consumption: distribution or a multicomponent programme?

机译:增加儿童的水果和蔬菜消费量:分配方案还是多组分方案?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

ObjectiveTo measure the effects of two school-based interventions on children's intake of fruit and vegetables (F&V).Design and methodsA total of six primary schools were randomly assigned to (1) a free F&V distribution programme, or (2) a multicomponent programme, consisting of a classroom curriculum and parental involvement. The two interventions were evaluated on their effects and compared with six control schools in a pre-testa€“post-test design. Two methods were used for dietary assessment: a pre-structured food recall and a food-frequency questionnaire including only F&V.SubjectsA total of 939 parents of children aged 4a€“12 years filled out the questionnaire at both pre-test and post-test. The response rate was 54%.ResultsMultilevel analyses showed that both programmes were equally effective in increasing children's fruit consumption by 0.2 portions per day. The free F&V distribution increased vegetable intake among non-native children and the oldest age group, and the multicomponent programme among the oldest children and girls. The distribution also caused an increased 24??h fruit, juice and vegetable intake among the youngest and the oldest age groups, and the multicomponent programme among all children.ConclusionThe results of this study indicate that both interventions were shown to be effective for different subgroups regarding age, gender and ethnicity. When comparing both interventions, the distribution programme was shown to be more effective, especially in increasing vegetable consumption. An important next step will be to investigate which intervention has the greatest potential to be implemented in primary schools.
机译:目的为了评估两种基于学校的干预措施对儿童摄入水果和蔬菜(F&V)的影响。设计和方法总共将六所小学随机分配给(1)免费的F&V分发计划,或(2)多元计划,包括课堂课程和家长参与。对这两种干预措施的效果进行了评估,并在测试前测试后的设计中与六所对照学校进行了比较。饮食评估采用两种方法:预先组织的食物召回和仅包括F&V的食物频率问卷。对象共有939名4岁至12岁儿童的父母在测试前和测试后填写了问卷。回应率为54%。结果多层次分析显示,这两个程序在将儿童每天的水果摄入量增加0.2份方面同样有效。免费F&V分配增加了非本地儿童和年龄最大的人群的蔬菜摄入量,并增加了年龄最大的儿童和女孩的多分量计划。该分布还导致最小年龄组和最大年龄组的24 h水果,果汁和蔬菜摄入量增加,并且所有儿童均采用了多组分程序。结论本研究结果表明,两种干预措施均对不同的亚组有效关于年龄,性别和种族。比较这两种干预措施时,分配方案显示出更有效的效果,尤其是在增加蔬菜消费方面。下一步的重要步骤是调查哪种干预措施最有可能在小学实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号