首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Workplace Learning >Workplace learning to create social quality
【24h】

Workplace learning to create social quality

机译:职场学习创造社会素质

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The present study aims to focus on workplace learning and understanding learning as creation (Kessels, 1995, 1996, 2001; Verdonschot, 2009; Billett and Choy, 2013) to bridge the gap between education and practice addressing the complex real world issue of poverty and social exclusion in The Netherlands. When researchers and practitioners are confronted with the dynamic complexity of the real world (Mahoney and Sanchez, 2004), it becomes evident how limited the ability of researchers and managers is to fully comprehend, describe, explain and (perhaps) predict the world as it is and as it is becoming. A mission of reconnecting theory-building from the outside and theory-building from the inside requires a process of interconnected research and practice in which interactions between managers and researchers have a purposeful focus on theory-building. Design/methodology/approach - The study is an example of engaged scholarship as proposed by Van de Ven and Johnson (2006) and a baseline study of a time series design from 2001-2008 comparing the effects of a "current treatment" in social work in The Netherlands at t0; explaining the collaborative design between practitioners, innovation consultants and scholars of a "new treatment"; and measuring the effects on social quality at t1. Findings - The paper provides insight in the level of social quality of clients in a situation of poverty and social exclusion. Lessons learned from workplace learning as creation in social work practice provides input for improving work practices through training and development of social workers. Research limitations/implications - Early notions for a potential new "treatment" have clearly not been fully dealt with in this baseline study. As stated this base-line study aims at overcoming the lack of insight in the client's life-world and open the black box to gain fresh insights. This is clearly just a first step of a much longer learning and creation process. Now that more insight in the clients life world is available, engaged researchers have proposed a new, more productive mindset of clients in a situation of poverty and social exclusion that they should not be regarded as a "granite base", but rather as "architects and builders" of their own life-worlds, with the social services as the "main contractor" to build trust, empower by helping to explicate personal survival strategies and planning for social inclusion (Van Damme, 1999). The limited number of respondents (N = 31) in this study is a limitation of this study, and findings cannot be generalised. Findings are no more than early indications and are not representative for other populations. Further research on a larger scale and in other research settings is needed. Practical implications - Implications are that design principles for a new and more participatory and socially oriented approach for workplace learning as creation should include the role of building trust in establishing relational quality between the public service organisation, other institutions and the client. First indications are that trust and empowerment may better enable clients in a situation of poverty and social exclusion to take charge of the design of their own lives and to construct and co-construct it accordingly. The role of actors from social services to build trusted relations, empower and co-construct an improved reality bear both elements of social learning, through dialogue (construct and co-construct knowledge = to know) and elements from social empowerment as part of the social quality concept (to act). Understanding the effects of the "current treatment" as input for workplace learning allows for an improved connection between practice and theory on workplace learning and social quality, thereby making a decisive contribution in closing the gap between real-world complex issues and education.
机译:目的-本研究旨在关注工作场所学习和将学习作为创造来理解(Kessels,1995年,1996年,2001年; Verdonschot,2009年; Billett和Choy,2013年),以弥合教育与实践之间的差距,以解决现实世界中复杂的问题。荷兰的贫困与社会排斥。当研究人员和从业人员面对现实世界的动态复杂性时(Mahoney和Sanchez,2004年),很明显,研究人员和管理人员充分理解,描述,解释和(也许)预测世界的能力是多么有限。是并且正在成为。将外部的理论构建与内部的理论构建重新联系起来的任务,需要一个相互联系的研究与实践过程,在此过程中,管理人员和研究人员之间的互动有目的地关注于理论构建。设计/方法/方法-该研究是范德温和约翰逊(2006)提出的聘用奖学金的一个例子,也是2001-2008年时间序列设计的基线研究,比较了“当前待遇”对社会工作的影响在荷兰,t0;解释从业者,创新顾问和学者之间“新疗法”的协作设计;并衡量在1时对社会质量的影响。调查结果-本文提供了在贫困和社会排斥情况下客户的社会素质水平的见解。从工作场所学习中获得的经验教训作为社会工作实践中的创造物,为通过培训和发展社会工作者来改善工作实践提供了投入。研究的局限性/含意-在这项基线研究中,尚未完全解决潜在的新“治疗”的早期概念。如前所述,这项基线研究旨在克服客户生活世界中缺乏洞察力的问题,并打开黑匣子以获取新的洞察力。显然,这只是更长的学习和创作过程的第一步。现在可以在客户的生活世界中获得更多的见解,敬业的研究人员已经提出了一种新的,更具生产力的,在贫困和社会排斥情况下的客户心态,他们不应将其视为“花岗岩基地”,而应视为“建筑师”者和他们自己的生活世界的建设者”,社会服务是建立信任的“主要承包商”,通过帮助阐明个人生存策略和规划社会包容性来增强能力(Van Damme,1999)。这项研究中有限的受访者人数(N = 31)是该研究的局限性,并且不能对发现进行概括。研究结果仅是早期迹象,并不代表其他人群。需要在更大的规模和其他研究环境中进行进一步研究。实际意义-暗示着一种新的,更具参与性和面向社会的工作场所学习方法的设计原则应包括在建立公共服务组织,其他机构与客户之间的关系质量中建立信任的作用。第一个迹象表明,信任和授权可以更好地使处于贫困和社会排斥状况下的客户负责自己的生活设计,并据此进行构建和共同构建。来自社会服务机构的行为者在建立可信赖的关系,赋予权力和共同构建改善的现实中所扮演的角色既包含社会学习的要素,也包括通过对话(构建和共同构建知识=要知道),以及来自社会赋权的要素,作为社会的一部分质量观念(行动)。了解“当前治疗方法”作为工作场所学习输入的效果,可以改善工作场所学习的实践和理论与社会素质之间的联系,从而为缩小现实中的复杂问题与教育之间的差距做出决定性的贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号