首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Incorporation of patient preferences in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a decision analytical view (see comments)
【24h】

Incorporation of patient preferences in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a decision analytical view (see comments)

机译:在上尿路结石的治疗中考虑患者的喜好:决策分析观点(请参阅评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: Patient preferences, or utilities, may be crucial to select an appropriate treatment plan for stone disease. We used decision modeling to understand better patient choices and decision making in the overall management of recurrent nephrolithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We interviewed 180 consecutive patients with active stone disease. Demographic data and historical experiences with calculi were recorded. Patients were presented with 6 hypothetical clinical scenarios and various treatment options. The standard gamble method was used to obtain utility values for each option. RESULTS: Nephrectomy had the lowest mean utility value of 0.883. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for severe, moderate and mild pain had utilities of 0.924, 0.932 and 0.947, respectively. Shock wave lithotripsy for the management of mild pain was the most attractive option (mean utility 0.968). The utility for long-term medical therapy was 0.949, which was between that of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy for mild pain. Patients with a surgical history of stone removal assigned lower utilities to invasive procedures (nephrectomy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, p <0.05). As the incidence of spontaneous stone passage increased, a higher utility was given to long-term medical therapy (p <0.05). Patients on medical therapy less than 1 year did not appreciate a significant benefit of medical prophylaxis. However, longer compliance with medical management led patients to perceive increasing benefits of continuing such medical treatment (p <0.05). Patients who had undergone stone removal via endoscopic or open surgery also had a higher preference for medical therapy (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had undergone stone removal wanted to avoid future invasive procedures. They ranked long-term medical therapy below shock wave lithotripsy but above invasive procedures, such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Most importantly, patients appreciated the benefits of medical therapy the longer that they complied with specific recommendations. These results support the concept that patients perceive long-term medical therapy to prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis as a desirable treatment option.
机译:目的:患者的喜好或实用性对于选择合适的结石治疗方案可能至关重要。我们使用决策模型来了解更好的患者选择和决策在复发性肾结石的整体治疗中。材料与方法:我们采访了180例活动性结石患者。记录了结石的人口数据和历史经验。为患者提供了6种假设的临床方案和各种治疗方案。标准赌博方法用于获取每个选项的效用值。结果:肾切除术的最低平均效用值为0.883。经皮肾镜取石术治疗严重,中度和轻度疼痛的效用分别为0.924、0.932和0.947。冲击波碎石术治疗轻度疼痛是最有吸引力的选择(平均效用0.968)。长期药物治疗的效用为0.949,介于轻度疼痛的经皮肾镜取石术和冲击波碎石术之间。有结石切除手术史的患者将较低的实用性分配给侵入性手术(肾切除术,经皮肾镜取石术,p <0.05)。随着自发性结石通过的发生率增加,长期药物治疗的效用更高(p <0.05)。接受药物治疗少于1年的患者并未意识到药物预防的显着益处。但是,对医疗管理的更长期依从性使患者意识到继续接受此类医疗的好处不断增加(p <0.05)。通过内窥镜或开放手术摘除结石的患者也更倾向于药物治疗(p <0.05)。结论:结石清除患者希望避免将来的侵入性手术。他们将长期药物治疗的等级低于冲击波碎石术,但高于侵入性程序,如经皮肾镜取石术。最重要的是,患者遵守特定建议的时间越长,他们就会越喜欢药物治疗的益处。这些结果支持这样的概念:患者接受长期药物治疗以防止复发性肾结石病为理想的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号