首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Cost comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy: analysis of individual parameters.
【24h】

Cost comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy: analysis of individual parameters.

机译:手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术和开腹肾切除术的成本比较:单个参数分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: Hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HAL) is an effective approach to nephrectomy that is less morbid than open nephrectomy (ON). In response to budgetary pressure at our large county hospital we reviewed the published experience and identified the cost components of HAL that could be targeted to decrease procedure cost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review of HAL and ON was performed and certain parameters were abstracted, including operative (OR) time, operative equipment and hospital stay (LOS). Using these data the projected overall cost and individual cost centers at our institution for HAL and ON were compared. Decision tree analysis models were devised to estimate the cost of each treatment using computer software. One and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of individual treatment variables on overall cost. RESULTS: The literature showed 6 and 9 reports on 127 and 419 patients for ON and HAL, respectively. LOS was 5 and 3 days for ON and HAL, respectively. OR time was 169 and 204 minutes for ON and HAL, respectively. Based on a review of the costs at our institution ON was a less costly procedure by
机译:目的:手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术(HAL)是一种有效的肾切除术,发病率比开放性肾切除术(ON)少。为了应对我们大型县医院的预算压力,我们回顾了已发表的经验,并确定了可以降低手术成本的HAL成本构成。材料与方法:对HAL和ON进行了全面的文献综述,并提取了某些参数,包括手术时间(OR),手术设备和住院时间(LOS)。使用这些数据,比较了我们机构HAL和ON的预计总体成本和各个成本中心。设计了决策树分析模型,以使用计算机软件估算每次治疗的费用。进行了单向和两向敏感性分析,以评估各个治疗变量对总成本的影响。结果:文献显示分别有127例和419例ON和HAL患者有6例和9例报道。 ON和HAL的LOS分别为5天和3天。 ON和HAL的OR时间分别为169分钟和204分钟。根据对我们机构成本的审查,ON的成本较低

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号