首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Renal outcome 25 years after donor nephrectomy.
【24h】

Renal outcome 25 years after donor nephrectomy.

机译:供体肾切除术后25年的肾脏结局。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: The extended outcome after kidney donation has been a particular concern ever since the recognition of hyperfiltration injury. Few published reports have examined donor renal outcome after 20 years or greater. Kidney transplantation has been performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation since 1963, at which there is extensive experience with live donor transplantation. We assess the impact of donor nephrectomy on renal function, urinary protein excretion and development of hypertension postoperatively to examine whether renal deterioration occurs with followup after 20 years or greater. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1963 to 1975, 180 live donor nephrectomies were performed at the Cleveland Clinic. We attempted to contact all patients to request participation in our study. Those 70 patients who agreed to participate in the study were mailed a package containing a 24-hour urine container (for assessment of creatinine, and total protein and albumin), a vial for blood collection (for assessment of serum creatinine) and a medical questionnaire. All specimens were returned to and processed by the Cleveland Clinic medical laboratories. Blood pressure was taken and recorded by a local physician. A 24-hour creatinine clearance and the Cockcroft-Gault formula were used to estimate renal function, and values were compared with an age adjusted glomerular filtration rate for a solitary kidney. RESULTS: Mean patient followup was 25 years. The 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance decreased to 72% of the value before donation. For the entire study cohort serum creatinine and systolic blood pressure after donation were significantly increased compared with values before, although still in the normal range. The overall incidence of hypertension was comparable to that expected in the age matched general population. There was no gender or age difference (younger or older than 50 years) for 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance, or change in serum creatinine before or after donation. Urinary protein and albumin excretion after donation was significantly higher in males compared with females. There were 13 (19%) subjects who had a 24-hour urinary protein excretion that was greater than 0.15 gm./24 hours, 5 (7%) of whom had greater than 0.8. No gender difference was noted in blood pressure, and there were no significant changes in diastolic pressure based on gender or age. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, renal function is well preserved with a mean followup of 25 years after donor nephrectomy. Males had significantly higher protein and albumin excretion than females but no other clinically significant differences in renal function, blood pressure or proteinuria were noted between them or at age of donation. Proteinuria increases with marginal significance but appears to be of no clinical consequence in most patients. Patients with mild or borderline proteinuria before donation may represent a subgroup at particular risk for the development of significant proteinuria 20 years or greater after donation. The overall incidence of proteinuria in our study is in the range of previously reported values after donor nephrectomy.
机译:目的:自从认识到超滤损伤以来,肾脏捐献后的结局延长一直是一个特别令人关注的问题。很少有发表的报告检查20年或更长时间后的供体肾结局。自1963年以来,克利夫兰诊所基金会就开始进行肾脏移植,当时在肾脏活体移植方面拥有丰富的经验。我们评估术后供体肾切除术对肾功能,尿蛋白排泄和高血压发展的影响,以检查是否在随访20年或更长时间后出现肾脏恶化。材料与方法:从1963年到1975年,克利夫兰诊所进行了180次活体供肾摘除术。我们试图联系所有患者以要求参与我们的研究。同意参加研究的这70名患者被邮寄了一个包装,其中装有一个24小时尿液容器(用于评估肌酐,总蛋白和白蛋白),一个用于采集血液的小瓶(用于评估血清肌酐)和一份医疗问卷。所有标本均送回克利夫兰诊所医学实验室处理。血压由当地医生记录并记录。使用24小时肌酐清除率和Cockcroft-Gault公式估算肾功能,并将该值与年龄校正的孤立肾的肾小球滤过率进行比较。结果:平均患者随访时间为25年。 24小时尿肌酐清除率降至捐赠前值的72%。在整个研究中,尽管捐献后的血清肌酐和收缩压仍处于正常范围,但与捐献前的值相比明显增加。高血压的总发病率与年龄相仿的普通人群的预期发病率相当。 24小时尿肌酐清除率无性别或年龄差异(年龄小于或等于50岁),或捐赠前后血清肌酐无变化。男性捐赠后尿蛋白和白蛋白排泄明显高于女性。有13名(19%)受试者的24小时尿蛋白排泄量大于0.15克/ 24小时,其中5名(7%)的尿蛋白排泄量大于0.8。血压没有性别差异,并且基于性别或年龄的舒张压也没有显着变化。结论:总体而言,供体肾切除术后平均随访25年,肾脏功能得到良好保护。男性的蛋白质和白蛋白排泄量明显高于女性,但在肾功能,血压或蛋白尿方面,在两个人之间或在捐赠年龄时,没有其他临床上显着的差异。蛋白尿的增加具有边际意义,但在大多数患者中似乎没有临床意义。捐赠前患有轻度或边缘性蛋白尿的患者可能代表一个亚组,在捐赠后20年或更长时间出现显着的蛋白尿风险。在我们的研究中,蛋白尿的总发生率在供体肾切除术后先前报道的数值范围内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号