首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Venovenous extracorporeal life support improves survival in adult trauma patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A multicenter retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Venovenous extracorporeal life support improves survival in adult trauma patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

机译:多中心回顾性队列研究显示,静脉体外生命支持可改善患有急性低氧血症性呼吸衰竭的成人创伤患者的生存

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Venovenous extracorporeal life support (VV ECLS) has been reported in adult trauma patients with severe respiratory failure; however, ECLS is not available in many trauma centers, few trauma surgeons have experience initiating ECLS and managing ECLS patients, and there is currently little evidence supporting its use in severely injured patients. This study seeks to determine if VV ECLS improves survival in such patients. METHODS: Data from two American College of Surgeons-verified Level 1 trauma centers, which maintain detailed records of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), were evaluated retrospectively. The study population included trauma patients between 16 years and 55 years of age treated for AHRF between January 2001 and December 2009. These patients were divided into two cohorts as follows: patients who received VV ECLS after an incomplete or no response to other rescue therapies (ECLS) versus patients who were managed with mechanical ventilation (CONV). The primary outcome was survival to discharge, and secondary outcomes were intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS), total ventilator days, and rate of complications requiring intervention. RESULTS: Twenty-six ECLS patients and 76 CONV patients were compared. Adjusted survival was greater in the ECLS group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.193; 95% confidence interval, 0.042-0.884; p = 0.034). Ventilator days, intensive care unit LOS, and hospital LOS did not differ between the groups. ECLS patients received more blood transfusions and had more bleeding complications, while the CONV patients had more pulmonary complications. A cohort of 17 ECLS and 17 CONV patients matched for age and lung injury severity also demonstrated a significantly greater survival in the ECLS group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.038; 95% confidence interval, 0.004-0.407; p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: VV ECLS is independently associated with survival in adult trauma patients with AHRF. ECLS should be considered in trauma patients with AHRF when conventional therapies prove ineffective; if ECLS is not readily available, transfer to an ECLS center should be pursued. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level III.
机译:背景:在严重呼吸衰竭的成年创伤患者中已有静脉静脉体外生命支持(VV ECLS)的报道。但是,ECLS在许多创伤中心尚不可用,很少有创伤外科医师具有启动ECLS和管理ECLS患者的经验,并且目前很少有证据支持在严重受​​伤的患者中使用ECLS。本研究旨在确定VV ECLS是否可以改善此类患者的生存率。方法:回顾性评估了来自两个美国外科医生学院验证的1级创伤中心的数据,这些中心保留了急性低氧血症性呼吸衰竭(AHRF)患者的详细记录。研究人群包括在2001年1月至2009年12月之间接受AHRF治疗的16岁至55岁之间的创伤患者。这些患者分为以下两个队列:在对其他抢救疗法不完全或无反应后接受VV ECLS的患者( ECLS)与接受机械通气(CONV)的患者。主要结局是出院生存,次要结局是重症监护病房和住院时间(LOS),呼吸机总天数以及需要干预的并发症发生率。结果:比较了26例ECLS患者和76例CONV患者。 ECLS组的调整生存率更高(调整优势比为0.193; 95%置信区间为0.042-0.884; p = 0.034)。两组之间的呼吸机天数,重症监护室服务水平和医院服务水平无差异。 ECLS患者输血更多,出血并发症更多,而CONV患者肺并发症更多。在年龄和肺部损伤严重程度相匹配的17名ECLS和17名CONV患者中,ECLS组的生存率也显着提高(校正比值比为0.038; 95%置信区间为0.004-0.407; p = 0.007)。结论:VV ECLS与AHRF成人创伤患者的生存独立相关。当常规疗法证明无效时,应在患有AHRF的创伤患者中考虑使用ECLS。如果ECLS尚不可用,则应转移到ECLS中心。证据级别:治疗研究,三级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号