首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >An in vitro study of the effect of different restorative materials on the reliability of a veneering porcelain
【24h】

An in vitro study of the effect of different restorative materials on the reliability of a veneering porcelain

机译:不同修复材料对贴面瓷器可靠性影响的体外研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Statement of problem Implant-supported, porcelain veneered restorations experience a greater rate of porcelain fracture than tooth-supported restorations. For completely edentulous patients, one approach to minimizing porcelain fracture is to use acrylic resin in the mandible, although its efficacy is unknown. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a veneering porcelain fatigued with different restorative materials in vitro. Material and methods Fifty-nine veneering porcelain disk specimens were fabricated by layering veneering porcelain on nickel-chromium base metal alloy disks. Four groups of different indenter materials fatigued the porcelain specimens: group WC, tungsten carbide served as a control; group FC, pressed leucite glass ceramic; group NHC, nanohybrid composite resin denture tooth; and group AR, unfilled acrylic resin denture tooth. Porcelain specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=14). A step-stress accelerated life-testing model was used. Use-level probability Weibull plots were generated, and the reliability of each group was estimated for a theoretical completion of 50 000 cycles at 150 N. Results Nanohybrid composite resin and unfilled acrylic resin denture tooth groups had higher reliability than tungsten carbide and leucite glass ceramic groups. No significant differences existed between the reliability of the tungsten carbide and leucite glass ceramic groups and the nanohybrid composite resin and acrylic resin denture tooth groups. Conclusions Veneering porcelain disk specimens fatigued with the unfilled acrylic resin and nanohybrid composite resin denture tooth indenters exhibited higher reliability than the specimens fatigued with either the tungsten carbide or leucite glass ceramic indenters. All of the veneering porcelain disk specimens failed with the same mode of fracture, although the surface posttest exhibited different fracture characteristics among specimens fatigued with the 4 different materials.
机译:问题陈述种植体支持的烤瓷贴面修复体比牙齿支持的修复体遭受更大的瓷器断裂。对于完全无牙的患者,将瓷器骨折最小化的一种方法是在下颌骨中使用丙烯酸树脂,尽管其功效尚不清楚。目的这项研究的目的是评估在体外用不同修复材料疲劳的饰面瓷的可靠性。材料和方法通过在镍铬基金属合金圆盘上层叠饰面瓷,制造了59个饰面瓷盘标本。四组不同的压头材料使瓷器样品疲劳:WC组,碳化钨作为对照组; FC组,压制白云石玻璃陶瓷; NHC组,纳米混合复合树脂假牙; AR组,未填充的丙烯酸树脂假牙。瓷标本随机分为4组(n = 14)。使用了逐步应力加速寿命测试模型。生成使用级别的概率威布尔图,并在150 N下理论上完成5万次循环后评估每组的可靠性。结果纳米混合复合树脂和未填充的丙烯酸树脂假牙牙齿组的可靠性高于碳化钨和白云母玻璃陶瓷组。碳化钨和白云石玻璃陶瓷基团的可靠性与纳米混合复合树脂和丙烯酸树脂假牙齿组的可靠性之间没有显着差异。结论用未填充的丙烯酸树脂和纳米混合复合树脂假牙压痕疲劳的饰面瓷盘样品比用碳化钨或白云石玻璃陶瓷压痕疲劳的样品具有更高的可靠性。尽管在使用4种不同材料疲劳的试样中,表面后测试显示出不同的断裂特性,但所有贴面瓷盘试样均以相同的断裂模式失败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号