首页> 外文期刊>Dental and Medical Problems >Evaluation of the fracture strength of porcelain sectional veneers made from different sintered feldspathic porcelains: An in vitro study
【24h】

Evaluation of the fracture strength of porcelain sectional veneers made from different sintered feldspathic porcelains: An in vitro study

机译:用不同烧结长石瓷制成的瓷切面贴面的断裂强度评估:体外研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background . Porcelain sectional veneers with no preparation (no-prep) are an ultra-conservative choice for the esthetic treatment of the anterior teeth. They can be made from a sintered feldspathic porcelain, which gives a great appearance with small thickness, but there are still concerns about the fracture strength of this material. Objectives . The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture strength of porcelain sectional veneers made from 2 different sintered feldspathic porcelains. Material and Methods . Twenty recently extracted human incisors were randomly divided into 2 groups according to the porcelain material (n = 10). The 1st group was applied the IPS Style? Ceram feldspathic porcelain and the 2nd group – GC InitialTM MC. The porcelain sectional veneers were fabricated following the manufacturers’ instructions. After the veneers bonded with resin cement (Variolink? N), the fracture strength was measured using a universal testing machine (Instron?1195) at 1 mm/min until failure occurred. Failure modes were determined under a stereomicroscope. Results . The mean fracture strength for group IPS Style Ceram was higher than that for group GC Initial MC (182.7 N and 155.7 N, respectively). The lowest value was observed in group IPS Style Ceram (78 N) and the highest value – also in the group IPS Style Ceram (294 N). Student’s t-test demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (p 0.05). Conclusion . There was no difference in the fracture strength of the porcelain sectional veneers for the 2 types of sintered porcelain used in this study. Cohesive failure within the porcelain sectional veneer was the most common mode of failure.
机译:背景 。无需准备(无准备)的瓷制截面贴面是前牙美学治疗的超保守选择。它们可以由烧结的长石瓷制成,虽然厚度小,外观却好看,但仍对这种材料的断裂强度感到担忧。目标。这项研究的目的是评估由2种不同的烧结长石瓷制成的瓷切面贴面的断裂强度。材料与方法 。根据瓷器材料将20个最近提取的人类门牙随机分为2组(n = 10)。第一组是否采用IPS风格? Ceram长石瓷和第二组– GC InitialTM MC。按照制造商的指示制造瓷制单板。用树脂水泥(Variolink®N)粘合薄板后,使用万能试验机(Instron®1195)以1 mm / min的速度测量断裂强度,直到发生破坏为止。在立体显微镜下确定失效模式。结果。 IPS型Ceram组的平均断裂强度高于GC初始MC组(分别为182.7 N和155.7 N)。 IPS Style Ceram组(78 N)观察到最低值,IPS Style Ceram组(294 N)观察到最高值。学生的t检验显示两组之间无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。结论。对于本研究中使用的两种类型的烧结瓷,瓷制单板的断裂强度没有差异。烤瓷单板内部的内聚破坏是最常见的破坏方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号