首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of pediatrics >Comparative effectiveness of empiric β-lactam monotherapy and β-lactam-macrolide combination therapy in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia
【24h】

Comparative effectiveness of empiric β-lactam monotherapy and β-lactam-macrolide combination therapy in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

机译:经验性β-内酰胺单药治疗和β-内酰胺-大环内酯类联合治疗在社区获得性肺炎住院儿童中的比较疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: To determine the comparative effectiveness of β-lactam monotherapy and β-lactam and macrolide combination therapy on clinical outcomes in the treatment of children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Study design: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included children aged 1-18 years who were hospitalized with CAP and received β-lactam antibiotic therapy either alone or in combination with a macrolide. Data were obtained from the Pediatric Health Information System. Associations between empiric antibiotic therapy and hospital readmission for the same episode of pneumonia were estimated using exact logistic regression. Associations between empiric antibiotic therapy and length of hospital stay were estimated using a generalized estimating equation with negative binomial distribution. Results: There were 20 743 patients hospitalized with CAP. Of these, 24% received β-lactam and macrolide combination therapy on admission. Compared with children who received β-lactam monotherapy, children who received β-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy were 20% less likely to stay in the hospital an additional day (adjusted relative risk 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.86) but did not have a different readmission rate (relative risk 0.69; 95% CI, 0.41-1.12). An effect of combination treatment on reduced length of stay was not evident in children <6 years of age but increased with increasing age groups thereafter. Conclusion: School-aged patients hospitalized with CAP who received β-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy have a shorter length of stay and similar rates of readmission compared with school-aged patients who receive β-lactam monotherapy.
机译:目的:确定β-内酰胺单药治疗和β-内酰胺与大环内酯类药物联合治疗在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院儿童治疗中的临床效果。研究设计:这项多中心回顾性队列研究包括1-18岁的CAP住院儿童,他们单独或与大环内酯联用接受β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗。数据从儿科健康信息系统获得。使用精确的逻辑回归分析估计经验性抗生素治疗与同一次肺炎住院再入院之间的关联。使用具有负二项式分布的广义估计方程估算经验性抗生素治疗与住院时间之间的关联。结果:共有20 743例CAP住院患者。其中24%的患者在入院时接受了β-内酰胺和大环内酯类药物的联合治疗。与接受β-内酰胺单药治疗的儿童相比,接受β-内酰胺加大环内酯类药物联合治疗的儿童住院第二天的可能性降低了20%(相对危险度调整后为0.80; 95%CI为0.75-0.86),但没有再入院率有所不同(相对风险0.69; 95%CI,0.41-1.12)。在<6岁的儿童中,联合治疗对缩短住院时间的作用不明显,但随其后年龄组的增加而增加。结论:与接受β-内酰胺单一疗法的学龄患者相比,接受CAP住院治疗的学龄患者接受β-内酰胺加大环内酯类联合疗法的住院时间更短,再入院率相近。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号