首页> 外文期刊>The annals of pharmacotherapy >Effectiveness of valsartan for treatment of hypertension: patient profiling and hierarchical modeling of determinants and outcomes (the PREVIEW study).
【24h】

Effectiveness of valsartan for treatment of hypertension: patient profiling and hierarchical modeling of determinants and outcomes (the PREVIEW study).

机译:缬沙坦治疗高血压的有效性:患者概况分析以及决定因素和结果的分层建模(PREVIEW研究)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patient- and clinician-related factors may explain variability in blood pressure (BP) outcomes and the differences between real-world effectiveness and efficacy seen in randomized trials of antihypertensive agents. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of 90 days of second-line valsartan treatment and identify patient- and physician-level determinants that impact BP outcomes. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, multilevel pharmaco-epidemiological study was conducted in 3194 hypertensive patients (systolic BP [SBP] > or =140 mm Hg, diastolic BP [DBP] > or =90 mm Hg; for diabetic patients, > or =130 and > or =80 mm Hg, respectively) treated by 504 general practitioners (GPs). Statistical analysis included heuristic data mining, and hierarchical linear and logistic modeling. RESULTS: With valsartan treatment, mean +/- SD SBP decreased from 154.4 +/- 15.5 mm Hg to 139.0 +/- 12.0 mm Hg and mean DBP decreased from 91.3 +/- 9.2 mm Hg to 82.6 +/- 7.4 mm Hg. SBP control rates increased from 9.0% to 38.6%, DBP from 25.5% to 65.5%, and combined SBP/DBP from 7.3% to 34.4%. A highly vulnerable cohort (n = 1063; 35.4%) of patients was identified. Twenty-four percent of variability in SBP and 25% of variability in DBP at 90 days were attributable to physician-related variables: guideline-compliant BP management, hypertension, practice patterns, hypertensive patient volume, and years in practice. The remaining 76% and 75% of variability in SBP and DBP, respectively, were due to patient factors, notably diabetes and related complications, vulnerability to uncontrolled BP, nonadherence, cardiovascular risk, and age. Similar factors increased the odds of treatment nonresponse, with diabetes being the single largest determinant of uncontrolled SBP (OR 8.99), DBP (OR 20.35), and combined SBP/DBP (OR = 18.64). CONCLUSIONS: Valsartan is effective and well tolerated in a broad range of patients in whom first-line antihypertensive treatment failed or was not tolerated. Mitigating the impact of BP-elevating variables and optimizing the effect of BP-lowering factors provides therapeutic benefits incremental to valsartan's pharmacologic effect. Improving outcomes in hypertensive patients involves 3 steps: (1) identifying, intuitively rather than formally, patients less likely to achieve BP control; (2) targeting modifiable or manageable patient- and physician-level determinants with BP-elevating or BP-lowering effects; and (3) managing variables that increase the odds and optimizing those that lower the odds of uncontrolled BP.
机译:背景:与患者和临床医生相关的因素可能解释了血压(BP)结果的可变性以及在抗高血压药的随机试验中看到的实际效果与疗效之间的差异。目的:研究缬沙坦二线治疗90天的有效性,并确定影响血压结果的患者和医师水平的决定因素。方法:对3194名高血压患者(收缩压[SBP]>或= 140 mm Hg,舒张压BP [DBP]>或= 90 mm Hg;糖尿病患者,≥或=)进行了前瞻性,多中心,多级药物流行病学研究。分别由504位全科医生(GP)治疗130和>或= 80 mm Hg。统计分析包括启发式数据挖掘以及分层线性和逻辑建模。结果:使用缬沙坦治疗后,平均+/- SD SBP从154.4 +/- 15.5 mm Hg下降至139.0 +/- 12.0 mm Hg,平均DBP从91.3 +/- 9.2 mm Hg下降至82.6 +/- 7.4 mm Hg。 SBP控制率从9.0%增加到38.6%,DBP从25.5%增加到65.5%,SBP / DBP组合从7.3%增加到34.4%。确定了高度脆弱的队列(n = 1063; 35.4%)的患者。 90天时SBP变异的24%和DBP变异的25%可归因于医生相关的变量:符合指南的BP管理,高血压,练习方式,高血压患者数量和实践年限。 SBP和DBP分别剩下的76%和75%的变异是由于患者因素,特别是糖尿病和相关并发症,对不受控制的BP的易感性,不依从性,心血管风险和年龄。相似的因素增加了治疗无反应的几率,其中糖尿病是不受控制的SBP(OR 8.99),DBP(OR 20.35)和SBP / DBP合并(OR = 18.64)的最大决定因素。结论:缬沙坦对一线抗高血压治疗失败或不耐受的广泛患者有效且耐受良好。减轻BP升高变量的影响并优化BP降低因子的作用可提供比缬沙坦的药理作用更强的治疗效果。改善高血压患者的预后包括3个步骤:(1)直观地而非正式地识别不太可能实现BP控制的患者; (2)定位具有BP升高或BP降低作用的可修改或可控制的患者和医师水平的决定因素; (3)管理增加赔率的变量,并优化那些降低不受控制的BP赔率的变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号