...
首页> 外文期刊>The annals of pharmacotherapy >Effectiveness of amlodipine-valsartan single-pill combinations: hierarchical modeling of blood pressure and total cardiovascular disease risk outcomes (the EXCELLENT study).
【24h】

Effectiveness of amlodipine-valsartan single-pill combinations: hierarchical modeling of blood pressure and total cardiovascular disease risk outcomes (the EXCELLENT study).

机译:氨氯地平-缬沙坦单药组合的有效性:血压和总心血管疾病风险结果的分级建模(EXCELLENT研究)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Both patient- and physician-related factors have been shown to explain variability in the outcomes of antihypertensive treatment. Total cardiovascular risk (TCVR) is increasingly used as a determinant of treatment effectiveness but has also been proposed as a treatment outcome. To our knowledge, no studies have reported how antihypertensive treatment impacts blood pressure and TCVR outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine in patients treated with a regimen including single-pill combinations (SPCs) of amlodipine/valsartan (1) blood pressure (BP) reduction and control, total cardiovascular risk (TCVR) change, and TCVR reduction of 1 class or more; (2) hierarchical patient- and physician-level determinants of these outcomes; and (3) predictors of uncontrolled BP and improved TCVR classification. METHODS: A prospective (90 days), multicenter, multilevel pharmacoepidemiologic study was conducted in 3546 patients with hypertension treated with SPC amlodipine/valsartan by 698 general practitioners. Statistical analysis included hierarchical linear and logistic modeling of BP and TCVR outcomes. RESULTS: Mean (SD) systolic BP (SBP) reductions were 20.1 (15.5) mm Hg and diastolic BP (DBP) reductions were 9.8 (10.3) mm Hg, with higher reductions among high-risk patients. SBP, DBP, and SBP/DBP control rates were 33.3%, 45.3%, and 25.5%, respectively, with lower rates among high-risk patients. Mean TCVR improvement was a reduction of 0.73 (0.96) classes (-4 [best] to +4 [worst]), with higher reductions for high-risk patients; 58.2% of patients achieved a TCVR reduction of 1 or more classes, with lower percentages for high-risk patients. Twenty-two percent of systolic variability and 26% of diastolic variability in 90-day BP values were attributable to a physician class effect, as was 16% of TCVR change. CONCLUSIONS: Regimens that include SPC amlodipine/valsartan formulations are effective in reducing BP and TCVR in a real-world observational setting. Hierarchical modeling identified patient- and physician-related determinants of BP values and TCVR change, as well as independent predictors of uncontrolled BP and reduced TCVR. TCVR is a scientifically feasible and clinically relevant effectiveness outcome of antihypertensive treatment.
机译:背景:已显示患者和医师相关因素均能解释抗高血压治疗结果的差异。总心血管风险(TCVR)越来越多地用作治疗效果的决定因素,但也被提出作为治疗结果。据我们所知,尚无研究报道降压治疗如何影响血压和TCVR结果。目的:检查接受包括氨氯地平/缬沙坦的单药组合(SPC)(1)血压(BP)降低和控制,总心血管风险(TCVR)变化以及TCVR降低1级或更多的方案的患者; (2)这些结果的分级患者和医师级别决定因素; (3)血压不受控制和TCVR分类得到改善的预测因子。方法:698名全科医生对3546例接受SPC氨氯地平/缬沙坦治疗的高血压患者进行了前瞻性(90天),多中心,多级药物流行病学研究。统计分析包括BP和TCVR结果的分层线性和逻辑模型。结果:平均(SD)收缩压(SBP)降低20.1(15.5)mm Hg,舒张压(DBP)降低9.8(10.3)mm Hg,高危患者中降低幅度更大。 SBP,DBP和SBP / DBP的控制率分别为33.3%,45.3%和25.5%,而高危患者的控制率较低。平均TCVR改善是减少0.73(0.96)级(从[最佳[-4]减至+4 [最差]),对于高危患者则降低得更多; 58.2%的患者实现了TCVR降低1级或更多级,而高危患者的TCVR降低了。在90天的BP值中,收缩压变异性的22%和舒张压变异性的26%归因于医生的影响,而TCVR变化的归因于16%。结论:包括SPC氨氯地平/缬沙坦制剂在内的方案在现实世界的观察环境中可有效降低BP和TCVR。分层建模确定了患者和医师相关的BP值和TCVR变化的决定因素,以及不受控制的BP和TCVR降低的独立预测因素。 TCVR是抗高血压治疗的科学可行和临床相关有效性结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号