首页> 外文期刊>The journal of pain: official journal of the American Pain Society >Treatment response in antidepressant-naive postherpetic neuralgia patients: double-blind, randomized trial.
【24h】

Treatment response in antidepressant-naive postherpetic neuralgia patients: double-blind, randomized trial.

机译:初次服用抗抑郁药的疱疹后神经痛患者的治疗反应:双盲,随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 47 patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) who had never had an adequate trial of any antidepressant, we performed a randomized, double-blind, parallel design trial comparing desipramine, amitriptyline, and fluoxetine. Patients were titrated to a maximum of 150 mg/day for desipramine and amitriptyline and 60 mg/day for fluoxetine over a 3-week period and then treated for an additional 3 weeks before tapering off study medication. A total of 38 subjects (81%) completed the entire trial. The modified intent-to-treat analysis of percent change in daily diary pain intensity scores showed no significant differences among the 3 drugs (ANOVA P = .120). Desipramine produced the greatest reduction in pain intensity (47%), followed by amitriptyline (38%) and fluoxetine (35%). Clinically meaningful pain relief (moderate or better) was significantly more likely with desipramine (12/15 patients) than with amitriptyline (9/17) or fluoxetine (5/15); chi(2)P = 0.036). The 11 subjects using opioids at study entry had smaller reductions in pain than those not using concomitant opioids. The fluoxetine group had the highest noncompletion rate (33%), with 1 subject hospitalized for hyponatremia. Although the magnitude of pain reduction and the category pain relief rating was not significantly different among the 3 drugs, the tricyclics desipramine and amitriptyline were well tolerated and provided clinically meaningful pain relief in 53% to 80% of subjects. PERSPECTIVE: Few clinical trials focus on patients who are naive to an entire class of medication. In this randomized blinded trial, the tricyclic antidepressants desipramine and amitriptyline were compared to the serotonin-selective antidepressant fluoxetine. All 3 drugs reduced PHN pain, with desipramine providing satisfactory relief in 80% of those treated.
机译:在47名从未接受过任何抗抑郁药充分试验的带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)患者中,我们进行了一项随机,双盲,平行设计试验,比较了地昔帕明,阿米替林和氟西汀。在3周内将患者的去甲丙胺和阿米替林滴定至最高150 mg /天,氟西汀滴定至60 mg /天,然后再治疗3周,然后逐渐减少研究药物。共有38位受试者(81%)完成了整个试验。修改后的每日疼痛强度评分变化百分比的意向性治疗分析显示,三种药物之间无显着差异(ANOVA P = .120)。地西拉明的疼痛强度降低最大(47%),其次是阿米替林(38%)和氟西汀(35%)。与阿米替林(9/17)或氟西汀(5/15)相比,地昔帕明(12/15患者)更有可能具有临床意义的缓解疼痛(中度或更好)。 chi(2)P = 0.036)。与不使用阿片类药物的受试者相比,参加研究时使用阿片类药物的11名受试者的疼痛减轻程度较小。氟西汀组的未完成率最高(33%),其中1名因低钠血症住院。尽管这三种药物在减轻疼痛的程度和缓解疼痛的类别上没有显着差异,但三环类去甲丙胺和阿米替林的耐受性良好,在53%至80%的受试者中具有临床意义的缓解疼痛。观点:很少有临床试验关注天真的患者。在这项随机双盲试验中,将三环类抗抑郁药地昔帕明和阿米替林与5-羟色胺选择性抗抑郁药氟西汀进行了比较。所有3种药物均减轻了PHN疼痛,其中地昔帕明能使80%的患者满意地缓解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号