首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of hospital infection >Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin compared with single-dose intravenous cefazolin for prophylaxis in inguinal hernia repair: a controlled randomized clinical study.
【24h】

Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin compared with single-dose intravenous cefazolin for prophylaxis in inguinal hernia repair: a controlled randomized clinical study.

机译:单剂量口服环丙沙星与单剂量静脉注射头孢唑林在腹股沟疝修补术中的预防作用:一项随机对照临床研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of single-dose intravenous cefazolin prophylaxis with single-dose oral ciprofloxacin prophylaxis in patients undergoing tension-free inguinal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh. In a prospective and randomized setting, 395 patients received either a single dose of 500mg of ciprofloxacin orally, 1-2h before the operation, or a single dose of 1g cefazolin intravenously on induction of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was to determine the wound infection rate within one year. The overall infection among the entire study population was 2% (eight of 395) including 2% (four of 199) of those receiving intravenous cefazolin and 2% (four of 196) of those treated with oral ciprofloxacin. There was no statistically significant difference between groups (P=0.59). All the infections were superficial incisional surgical site infections, and none progressed to a deep infection. Escherichia coli was the most commonly isolated bacterium. None of the infected patientsdeveloped recurrence of hernia. The rate of recurrence was 1.3% (five of 395) at one year including 2% (four of 199) of those receiving cefazolin and 0.5% (one of 196) of those receiving ciprofloxacin. Oral ciprofloxacin prophylaxis was found to be an attractive option with its wide antibacterial spectrum, low cost and ease of administration in patients undergoing tension-free inguinal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较单剂量口服头孢唑啉预防与单剂量口服环丙沙星预防对接受聚丙烯网无张力腹股沟疝修补术的患者的疗效。在前瞻性和随机分组的情况下,395例患者在手术前1-2h口服500mg环丙沙星或在麻醉后静脉注射1g头孢唑啉。主要结果是确定一年内的伤口感染率。在整个研究人群中,总感染率为2%(395名中的八名),包括接受静脉注射头孢唑啉的2%(199名中的四名)和口服环丙沙星治疗的2%(196名中的四名)。两组之间无统计学差异(P = 0.59)。所有感染均为浅表切开手术部位感染,无一例进展为深部感染。大肠杆菌是最常见的分离细菌。感染的患者均未出现疝复发。一年的复发率为1.3%(五分之三395),其中接受头孢唑林的为2%(199名中的四名),接受环丙沙星的为0.5%(196名中的一员)。口服环丙沙星被认为是一种有吸引力的选择,因为它具有广泛的抗菌谱,低成本和易于使用聚丙烯网片进行无张力腹股沟疝修补术的患者给药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号