首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Can the oxford scores be used to monitor symptomatic progression of patients awaiting knee or hip arthroplasty?
【24h】

Can the oxford scores be used to monitor symptomatic progression of patients awaiting knee or hip arthroplasty?

机译:牛津分数可以用于监测等待膝关节或髋关节置换术的患者的症状进展吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We report the week-to-week variation of the Oxford Knee and Oxford Hip Score (OKS, OHS) in individuals with severe osteoarthritis. People waitlisted for knee (n. = 51) or hip arthroplasty (n. = 52) were assessed twice, 1-week apart. There were no major week-to-week systematic biases in the scores. Limits of agreement (LOA) for both scores were wide (OKS, -. 9.5 to 6.6; OHS, -. 7.7 to 7). For most individual questions, the answers varied by ≤. 1 point in over 90% of participants. The week-to-week 95% LOA for the Oxford scores are unacceptably large, but variations within the individual questions are minimal. Consequently, reference to variation in the individual questions may be more useful for monitoring a patient's preoperative clinical change than changes in the total Oxford score. We conclude that the total scores are not suitable for monitoring the progression of OA in individual patients.
机译:我们报告了严重骨关节炎患者的牛津膝盖和牛津髋关节评分(OKS,OHS)的每周变化。等待入组的膝盖(n = 51)或髋关节置换术(n = 52)的患者进行了两次评估,相隔1周。分数没有重大的每周到每周的系统偏差。两个分数的一致性限制(LOA)较宽(OKS,-。9.5至6.6; OHS,-。7.7至7)。对于大多数单个问题,答案的差异为≤。 90%以上的参与者中获得1分。牛津分数的每周95%的LOA值过大,但是各个问题之间的差异很小。因此,与牛津总评分的变化相比,参考各个问题的变化对监测患者的术前临床变化可能更有用。我们得出的结论是,总分不适合监测单个患者的OA进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号