首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Letter to the Editor: Patient-Specific Instrumentation Does Not Shorten Surgical Time: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
【24h】

Letter to the Editor: Patient-Specific Instrumentation Does Not Shorten Surgical Time: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

机译:致编辑的信:特定于患者的器械不会缩短手术时间:前瞻性随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We are surprised to read the conclusions of this RCT, which compared the time taken to do a primary TKA using conventional jigs and PSI [1 ]. The conclusions of this study are not in agreement with the previously published studies or with our experience. Most studies either report significant or non-significant differences in the duration of the surgery between the PSI and traditional groups with decreased duration of surgery in PSI group [2-5]. This seems logical, in our view, since almost one-third of the operative steps are not required in PSI group and hence saving the total operative time. We appreciate the self-confession of the authors, about the shortcomings and weaknesses of their study, like limited experience of the surgeon to use PSI technology.
机译:我们很惊讶地看到该RCT的结论,该结论比较了使用传统夹具和PSI进行一次主TKA所需的时间[1]。该研究的结论与先前发表的研究或我们的经验不一致。大多数研究报告说,PSI组与传统组之间的手术时间差异显着或不显着,而PSI组的手术时间却有所减少[2-5]。在我们看来,这似乎是合乎逻辑的,因为PSI组几乎不需要三分之一的手术步骤,从而节省了总手术时间。我们感谢作者的自白,对他们研究的缺点和不足,例如外科医生使用PSI技术的经验有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号