首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Treatment of Severe Bone Defects During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones-A Systematic Review
【24h】

Treatment of Severe Bone Defects During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones-A Systematic Review

机译:结构同种异体移植和多孔金属锥体修复全膝关节置换术中的严重骨缺损-系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aseptic loosening and focal osteolysis are the most common reasons for knee arthroplasty failure. The best treatment remains unclear. We reviewed the literature on the treatment of revision knee arthroplasty using bony structural allografts (476 cases) and porousmetal cones (223 cases) to determine if a difference in the revision failure rates was discernable. The failure rates were compared using a logistic regression model with adjustment for discrepancies in FU time and number of grafts used (femoral, tibial, or both). In this analysis, the porous implant shows a significantly decreased loosening rate in AORI 2 and 3 defects. The overall failure rate was also substantially lower in the porous metal group than the structural allograft group; little difference in the infection rates was noted. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
机译:无菌性松动和局灶性骨溶解是膝关节置换术失败的最常见原因。最佳治疗方案尚不清楚。我们回顾了有关使用骨结构同种异体移植物(476例)和金属多孔体(223例)治疗翻修膝关节置换术的文献,以确定翻修失败率的差异是否可辨别。使用逻辑回归模型比较失败率,并调整FU时间和所用移植物的数量(股骨,胫骨或两者)的差异。在此分析中,多孔植入物的AORI 2和3缺陷的松动率显着降低。多孔金属组的总故障率也明显低于同种异体结构组。注意到感染率差异不大。 (C)2014作者。由Elsevier Inc.发行。这是CC BY-NC-ND许可下的开放获取文章。 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号