...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of dermatology >Examination of the correlation between the manual and automated serological testing methods for syphilis
【24h】

Examination of the correlation between the manual and automated serological testing methods for syphilis

机译:梅毒的手动和自动血清学检测方法之间的相关性检查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We evaluated the correlation between the conventional manual serological testing method for syphilis and a novel automated serological testing method and between six different reagents used in the automated method. Twenty-six serum samples, which were positive on non-treponemal manual serological testing, were obtained from 19 patients with early syphilis. The samples were manually analyzed using the non-treponemal serological test for syphilis kit and automatically analyzed using six different reagents approved by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan. Statistically significant correlations were observed between most of the reagents used in the automated testing (r = 0.652-0.996, P < 0.001), except for one combination of the reagents. In the simple regression analysis, the slope of the simple regression line (range, 0.014-3.040) and some of the regression coefficients were not equal to 1.0. Therefore, it is recommended that when the automated serological testing method is used to test for syphilis, the same reagent should be consistently selected to evaluate the changes in antibody titers. Statistically significant correlations were also observed between the manual method and all the reagents used in the automated method (r = 0.682-0.811, P < 0.001). In this case, the regression coefficients ranged 0.375-6.270, and the simple regression line intercept ranged -71.926 to 4.184. The regression coefficient and the intercept between the manual method and some of the reagents used in the automated method were not similar to the values described in the documentation attached to the reagents used in this study.
机译:我们评估了梅毒的常规手动血清学检测方法与新型自动血清学检测方法之间的相关性,以及自动化方法中使用的六种不同试剂之间的相关性。从19例早期梅毒患者中获得了26份血清样本,这些样本在非脊髓灰质炎手动血清学检测中呈阳性。使用非梅毒梅毒检测试剂盒对样品进行手动分析,并使用日本厚生劳动省批准的六种不同试剂自动分析样品。除一种试剂组合外,在自动化测试中使用的大多数试剂之间均观察到统计学上的显着相关性(r = 0.652-0.996,P <0.001)。在简单回归分析中,简单回归线的斜率(范围为0.014-3.040)和某些回归系数不等于1.0。因此,建议在使用自动血清学检测方法检测梅毒时,应始终选择相同的试剂来评估抗体滴度的变化。在手动方法和自动方法中使用的所有试剂之间也观察到统计学上显着的相关性(r = 0.682-0.811,P <0.001)。在这种情况下,回归系数的范围为0.375-6.270,简单回归线的截距范围为-71.926至4.184。回归系数和手动方法与自动方法中使用的某些试剂之间的截距与本研究中使用的试剂所附文档中描述的值不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号