...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >Assessing the efficacy of desvenlafaxine for improving functioning and well-being outcome measures in patients with major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis of 9 double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week clinical trials.
【24h】

Assessing the efficacy of desvenlafaxine for improving functioning and well-being outcome measures in patients with major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis of 9 double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week clinical trials.

机译:评估地斯拉法辛在改善重度抑郁症患者的功能和改善健康状况方面的功效:对9项双盲,安慰剂对照,为期8周的临床试验进行汇总分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of desvenlafaxine therapy on functioning and well-being in major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD: Total and individual item Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) scores from 8 double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week desvenlafaxine clinical trials were pooled. Scores on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS(17)) work/activities and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) lassitude items were pooled from 9 studies. Outpatients with DSM-IV MDD were randomly assigned to fixed (5 studies; 50, 100, 200, or 400 mg/d; n = 1,342) or flexible (4 studies, 100-400 mg/d; n = 463) doses of desvenlafaxine or placebo (n = 1,108). Data from each patient's final evaluation were analyzed for the total population and for individual dose groups from the fixed-dose studies and were compared between groups using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, desvenlafaxine therapy resulted in significantly greater improvements in SDS total score (-2.0) and individual items regarding work (-0.6), social life/leisure activities (-0.8), and family life/home responsibilities (-0.7; P < .001 for all comparisons), as well as WHO-5 total score (1.7) and individual items (good spirits [0.4], calm/relaxed [0.4], active/vigorous [0.3], fresh/rested [0.3], and interest [0.3]; P < .001 for all comparisons). Desvenlafaxine treatment resulted in significant improvements on the HDRS(17) work/activities (-0.2; P < .001) and MADRS lassitude (-0.3; P < .001) items compared with placebo. Significant differences were observed for the individual fixed-dose groups on all outcomes (P < .05); there was no evidence of a dose-response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Desvenlafaxine therapy resulted in significant improvements in the functioning and well-being among MDD patients.
机译:目的:评估去甲文拉法辛治疗对重度抑郁症(MDD)功能和幸福感的影响。方法:汇总了来自8项双盲,安慰剂对照,为期8周的去甲文拉法辛临床试验的总和单独项希恩残疾量表(SDS)和5项世界卫生组织幸福感指数(WHO-5)得分。从9个研究中汇总了17个项目的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS(17))工作/活动和蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)乏味项的得分。 DSM-IV MDD的门诊患者随机分配固定剂量(5个研究; 50、100、200或400 mg / d; n = 1,342)或灵活剂量(4个研究,100-400 mg / d; n = 463)去甲文拉法辛或安慰剂(n = 1,108)。分析来自每个患者最终评估的数据,以总人口和固定剂量研究的各个剂量组进行分析,并使用协方差分析在各组之间进行比较。结果:与安慰剂相比,去甲文拉法辛治疗显着改善了SDS总分(-2.0)和有关工作(-0.6),社交/休闲活动(-0.8)和家庭生活/家庭责任(-0.7)的单个项目;对于所有比较,P <.001),以及WHO-5总得分(1.7)和单个项目(精神振奋[0.4],镇定/放松[0.4],积极/有活力[0.3],新鲜/休息[0.3] ]和兴趣[0.3];对于所有比较,P <.001)。与安慰剂相比,去甲文拉法辛治疗显着改善了HDRS(17)的工作/活动(-0.2; P <.001)和MADRS轻度(-0.3; P <.001)。各个固定剂量组在所有结局上均观察到显着差异(P <.05);没有证据表明存在剂量反应关系。结论:去甲文拉法辛治疗显着改善了MDD患者的功能和幸福感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号