首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of heart and lung transplantation: the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation >Efficacy and durability of central oversewing for treatment of aortic insufficiency in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
【24h】

Efficacy and durability of central oversewing for treatment of aortic insufficiency in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices

机译:中央缝合在连续流左心室辅助装置治疗主动脉瓣关闭不全中的功效和耐用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Aortic insufficiency (AI) in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) results in regurgitant volume returning from the aorta to the left ventricle, increased LVAD pump volume and reduced systemic cardiac output. One common strategy to address AI during CF-LVAD support is central oversewing of the aortic valve, which allows some opening between the valve leaflets laterally. However, the long-term durability of this technique has not been extensively described. Methods All patients who underwent central oversewing of the aortic valve during CF-LVAD support between January 2006 and March 2013 were included in this analysis. Pre- and post-procedure intra-operative transesophageal echocardiograms (TEEs) were reviewed to determine the efficacy of the surgical technique, whereas all subsequent transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) were reviewed to assess durability. AI severity was graded using the vena contracta (VC) width and the ratio between the VC and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter. Results Nineteen patients with central aortic valve oversewing were identified. Median follow-up was 560 days (range 46 to 954 days). All but 1 patient had their aortic insufficiency reduced to "none/trace" on post-operative TEE. There was no statistically significant increase in the VC width and VC/LVOT ratio between the first and last follow-up echocardiograms, and only 2 patients developed more than mild aortic insufficiency after central oversewing. Central oversewing of the aortic valve did not adversely affect outcomes after LVAD implantation. Conclusion Central oversewing of the aortic valve is an effective and durable means of addressing greater than mild AI in patients with CF-LVAD.
机译:背景连续流左心室辅助装置(CF-LVAD)支持的患者的主动脉瓣关闭不全(AI)导致反流体积从主动脉返回至左心室,增加了LVAD泵体积,并降低了系统性心输出量。在CF-LVAD支撑过程中解决AI的一种常见策略是主动脉瓣中央缝合,这可以在瓣膜小叶之间横向打开。然而,尚未广泛描述该技术的长期耐久性。方法将2006年1月至2013年3月期间在CF-LVAD支持期间接受主动脉瓣中央缝合的所有患者纳入本分析。术前和术后术中经食道超声心动图(TEE)进行了审查,以确定手术技术的有效性,而所有随后的经胸超声心动图(TTE)进行了评估,以评估耐久性。 AI严重程度使用腔静脉收缩(VC)宽度和VC与左心室流出道(LVOT)直径之间的比率进行分级。结果确定了19例主动脉瓣过缝合的患者。中位随访时间为560天(46到954天)。除1名患者外,其余患者在术后TEE时主动脉瓣关闭不全均降至“无/痕迹”。第一次和最后一次随访超声心动图之间的VC宽度和VC / LVOT比没有统计学上的显着增加,只有2例患者在中央缝合后出现了轻度主动脉瓣关闭不全。 LVAD植入后主动脉瓣的中央缝合不会对预后产生不利影响。结论主动脉瓣中央缝合是解决CF-LVAD患者大于轻度AI的有效且持久的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号