...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of continuing education in the health professions >Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: The influence of doctor and rater group characteristics
【24h】

Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: The influence of doctor and rater group characteristics

机译:多源反馈中的自我达成协议:医生和评估者群体特征的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction:: Multisource feedback (MSF) ratings provided by patients and colleagues are often poorly correlated with doctors' self-assessments. Doctors' reactions to feedback depend on its agreement with their own perceptions, but factors influencing self-other agreement in doctors' MSF ratings have received little attention. We aimed to identify the characteristics of doctors and their rater groups that affect self-other agreement in MSF ratings. Methods:: We invited 2454 doctors to obtain patient and colleague feedback using the UK General Medical Council's MSF questionnaires and to self-assess on core items from both patient (PQ) and colleague (CQ) questionnaires. Correlations and differences between doctor, patient and colleague mean feedback scores were examined. Regression analyses identified the characteristics of doctors and their rater groups that influenced self-other score agreement. Results:: 1065 (43%) doctors returned at least one questionnaire, of whom 773 (73%) provided self and patient PQ scores and 1026 (96%) provided self and colleague CQ scores. Most doctors rated themselves less favourably than they were rated by either their patients or their colleagues. This tendency to underrate performance in comparison to external feedback was influenced by the doctor's place of training, clinical specialty, ethnicity and the profile of his/her patient and colleague rater samples but, in contrast to studies undertaken in nonmedical settings, was unaffected by age or gender. Discussion:: Self-other agreement in MSF ratings is influenced by characteristics of both raters and ratees. Managers, appraisers, and others responsible for interpreting and reviewing feedback results with the doctor need to be aware of these influences. ? 2013 The Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, the Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education, and the Council on CME, Association for Hospital Medical Education.
机译:简介:患者和同事提供的多源反馈(MSF)评分通常与医生的自我评估没有很好的相关性。医生对反馈的反应取决于反馈与他们自己的看法的一致,但是影响医生MSF评分中的其他自我一致的因素却很少受到关注。我们的目的是确定影响无国界医生分级中彼此自律的医生及其评估者群体的特征。方法::我们邀请了2454名医生使用英国全科医学理事会的MSF问卷获得患者和同事的反馈,并对患者(PQ)和同事(CQ)问卷中的核心项目进行自我评估。检查了医生,患者和同事的平均反馈得分之间的相关性和差异。回归分析确定了影响其自身得分评分的医生及其评估者群体的特征。结果:: 1065(43%)名医生至少返回了一份调查问卷,其中773名(73%)提供了自我和患者的PQ评分,102​​6名(96%)提供了自身和同事的CQ评分。大多数医生对自己的评价不及患者或同事的评价。与外部反馈相比,这种低估表现的趋势受到医生的培训地点,临床专业,种族以及患者和同事评估者样本的概况的影响,但与在非医学环境中进行的研究相比,不受年龄的影响或性别。讨论:无国界医生(MSF)评级中的自我-其他协议受评级者和被评级者特征的影响。经理,评估师和其他与医生一起解释和查看反馈结果的人员需要意识到这些影响。 ? 2013年,卫生专业继续教育联盟,学术继续医学教育学会和CME理事会,医院医学教育协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号