首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of continuing education in the health professions >How rehabilitation therapists gather, evaluate, and implement new knowledge.
【24h】

How rehabilitation therapists gather, evaluate, and implement new knowledge.

机译:康复治疗师如何收集,评估和实施新知识。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation therapists are strongly encouraged to apply research to their practices, but relatively little is known about the processes therapists use for continuing their education. This study examines the strategies used by a sample of therapists to gather new knowledge, evaluate its appropriateness to their clinical problems, and implement new learning into their practices. METHODS: Twenty-four randomly selected occupational therapists and physical therapists from a large metropolitan area participated in in-depth interviews. Descriptive codes within interview transcripts described participants' individual approaches to continuing education (CE). Themes derived from comparative analysis across interviews were interpreted, building on prior understandings and suggesting strategies for CE research and programs. RESULTS: Participants valued formal CE highly and expressed frustration concerning its limited availability. Most participants relied on informal consultations with peers as their first educational resource. Peers also supported participants' evaluation and implementation of new knowledge. Although seven participants reported use of systematic methods to access, evaluate, and implement new knowledge, others described more haphazard approaches toward evaluation and application of their learning. Participants identified economic, administrative, and interprofessional barriers to integration of new knowledge into their practices. DISCUSSION: There is a need to develop and incorporate guidelines for evaluating and implementing learning within formal and informal CE programs. The appeal of formal CE suggests that more efficient strategies for continuing rehabilitation are required. Therapists' heavy reliance on peers suggests that educationally influential therapists may be effective media for informal CE interventions. CE targeted to policy makers should focus on promoting organizational change to enhance therapists' translation of research into practice.
机译:简介:强烈建议康复治疗师对他们的实践进行研究,但对治疗师用于继续教育的过程所知甚少。这项研究研究了样本治疗师用来收集新知识,评估其对临床问题的适当性以及在他们的实践中实施新的学习所使用的策略。方法:来自大都市地区的24名随机选择的职业治疗师和物理治疗师参加了深入访谈。访谈笔录中的描述性代码描述了参与者的继续教育(CE)的个别方法。基于先前的理解并为CE研究和计划提出了策略,对访谈中的比较分析得出的主题进行了解释。结果:参与者对正式的CE表示高度评价,并对其有限的可用性表示沮丧。大多数参与者将与同伴的非正式磋商作为他们的第一教育资源。同行们还支持参与者评估和实施新知识。尽管有七名参与者报告了使用系统的方法来访问,评估和实施新知识,但其他参与者则描述了在评估和应用他们的学习中使用更多随机方法。参与者确定了将新知识整合到实践中的经济,行政和专业间的障碍。讨论:有必要在正式和非正式的CE计划中制定和纳入评估和实施学习的准则。正式行政长官的呼吁表明,需要更有效的持续康复策略。治疗师对同龄人的严重依赖表明,具有教育影响力的治疗师可能是非正式CE干预的有效媒介。针对政策制定者的行政长官应专注于促进组织变革,以促进治疗师将研究转化为实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号