首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of clinical dentistry. >Efficacy of two different toothbrush heads on a sonic power toothbrush compared to a manual toothbrush on established gingivitis and plaque
【24h】

Efficacy of two different toothbrush heads on a sonic power toothbrush compared to a manual toothbrush on established gingivitis and plaque

机译:与手动牙刷相比,声波动力牙刷上两种不同牙刷头对牙龈炎和牙菌斑的功效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a power toothbrush with distinct multi-directional cleaning action using two different heads (Colgate? ProClinical? C200 toothbrush with either a triple clean head or a sensitive head) as compared to a manual flat-trim toothbrush (Oral B? Indicator toothbrush) on supragingival plaque and established gingivitis. This examiner-blind, randomized, controlled, three-treatment, parallel-group clinical research study assessed plaque removal via the comparison of pre- to post-brushing after a single use and again after four weeks of use, using the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index. This study also assessed gingivitis at four weeks using the L?e-Silness Gingival Index. Qualifying adult male and female subjects from the central New Jersey, USA area reported to the study site after refraining from any oral hygiene procedures for 24 hours, and from eating, drinking, and smoking for four hours. Following an examination for plaque and gingivitis, they were randomized into three balanced groups. Subjects were instructed to brush their teeth for two minutes under supervision with their assigned toothbrush and a commercially available toothpaste (Colgate? Cavity Protection toothpaste), after which they were again evaluated for plaque. Subjects were dismissed from the study site with the toothpaste and their assigned toothbrush to use at home twice daily for the next four weeks. They reported to the study site after four weeks of product use, at which time they were evaluated for plaque and gingivitis. ? Results: One hundred twenty (120) enrolled subjects complied with the protocol and completed the clinical study. The results of the study indicated that all three test products provided statistically significant reductions in pre-brushing to post-brushing plaque scores for whole mouth and interproximal sites after a single use. For gingival margin plaque sites, only the Colgate ProClinical C200 toothbrush, with either the triple clean head or the sensitive head, provided statistically significant reductions in pre- to post-brushing plaque scores. After four weeks of product use, all three test products provided statistically significant reductions in baseline to four-week whole mouth and interproximal site plaque scores, but only the Colgate ProClinical C200 toothbrush, with either the triple clean head or the sensitive head, provided a statistically significant reduction in plaque scores at gingival margin sites. All three test products provided statistically significant reductions in gingival and gingivitis severity index scores after four weeks of product use. Relative to the manual toothbrush group, after a single tooth brushing the Colgate ProClinical C200 toothbrush, with either the triple clean head or sensitive head, provided statistically significantly greater reductions in whole mouth plaque index scores (51.9% and 59.3%, respectively), in gingival margin plaque index scores (700% and 650%, respectively), and interproximal plaque index scores (64.2% and 60.4%, respectively). Relative to the manual toothbrush group, after four weeks of use the Colgate ProClinical C200 toothbrush, with either the triple clean head or sensitive head, provided statistically significantly greater reductions in whole mouth plaque index scores (78.6%, and 82.1%, respectively), in gingival margin plaque index scores (3700% and 3400%, respectively), and interproximal plaque index scores (50.8% and 52.5%, respectively). Relative to the manual toothbrush group, after four weeks of use the Colgate ProClinical C200 toothbrush, with either the triple clean head or sensitive head, provided statistically significantly greater reductions in gingival index scores of 900% and 833%, respectively, and in gingivitis severity index scores of 466.7% and 600%, respectively. All statistically significant reductions were at the p ≤ 0.05 level. There were no statistically significant differences between the scores of the Colgate
机译:目的:与使用手动平头牙刷(口服)相比,使用两个不同的牙刷头(具有三重清洁头或灵敏头的Colgate?ProClinical?C200牙刷)评估具有独特的多向清洁作用的电动牙刷的功效B?指示牙刷)在龈上菌斑和已确定的齿龈炎上。这项盲人,随机,对照,三治疗,平行治疗的临床研究小组通过使用Rustogi改良海军斑块通过比较单次使用后和使用四周后的刷前和后刷毛来评估斑块的去除情况。指数。这项研究还使用L-e-Silness牙龈指数评估了4周时的牙龈炎。来自美国新泽西州中部地区的合格成年男性和女性受试者在不进行任何口腔卫生操作24小时,进食,饮水和吸烟4小时后向研究地点报告。检查斑块和牙龈炎后,将它们随机分为三组。指示受试者在指定的牙刷和市售牙膏(Colgate?蛀牙保护牙膏)的监督下刷牙2分钟,然后再次评估牙菌斑。使用牙膏和分配的牙刷将受试者驱逐出研究地点,然后在接下来的四个星期中每天两次在家中使用。他们在使用产品四个星期后向研究地点报告,这时对他们的牙菌斑和牙龈炎进行了评估。 ?结果:一百二十(120)名受试者符合该方案并完成了临床研究。研究结果表明,所有三种测试产品在单次使用后,在整个口腔和近端部位的刷牙前至刷牙后牙菌斑得分均具有统计学上的显着降低。对于牙龈缘斑块部位,只有具有三重清洁头或敏感头的高露洁ProClinical C200牙刷在刷牙前后的牙菌斑得分上具有统计学意义的降低。在使用产品四个星期后,所有三个测试产品的基准值均在统计学上显着降低至四个星期的全口和近端间牙菌斑分数,但只有具有三重清洁头或敏感头的高露洁ProClinical C200牙刷可以提供牙龈边缘部位的牙菌斑得分有统计学意义的降低。在使用产品四周后,所有三种测试产品的牙龈和牙龈炎严重程度指数得分均在统计学上显着降低。相对于手动牙刷组,用三重清洁头或敏感头单刷高露洁ProClinical C200牙刷后,从统计学上讲,其全口菌斑指数得分的降低幅度更大(分别为51.9%和59.3%)。牙龈边缘斑块指数得分(分别为700%和650%)和齿间斑块指数得分(分别为64.2%和60.4%)。相对于手动牙刷组,使用三倍清洁头或敏感头的高露洁ProClinical C200牙刷使用四个星期后,在统计学上显着降低了全口菌斑指数(分别为78.6%和82.1%),牙龈边缘斑块指数得分(分别为3700%和3400%)和近邻斑块指数得分(分别为50.8%和52.5%)。相对于手动牙刷组,使用三倍清洁头或敏感头的高露洁ProClinical C200牙刷使用四个星期后,统计学上牙龈指数得分分别降低了900%和833%,并且牙龈炎的严重程度明显降低指数得分分别为466.7%和600%。所有具有统计学意义的降低均在p≤0.05的水平上。高露洁的得分之间没有统计学上的显着差异

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号