...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology >Efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A systematic review
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A systematic review

机译:系统治疗中度至重度特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Many patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) require systemic immunomodulating treatment to achieve adequate disease control. Objective We sought to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (until June 2012). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating systemic immunomodulating treatments for moderate-to-severe AD were included. Selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and generation of treatment recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach were performed independently by 2 reviewers. Efficacy outcomes were clinical signs, symptoms, quality of life, and the course of AD. Safety data were compared by calculating the weekly incidence rates (as percentages) for adverse events. Results Thirty-four RCTs with 12 different systemic treatments and totaling 1653 patients were included. Fourteen trials consistently indicate that cyclosporin A efficaciously improves clinical signs of AD. Cyclosporin A is recommended as first-line treatment for short-term use. A second-line treatment option is azathioprine, but efficacy is lower, and evidence is weaker. Methotrexate can be considered a third-line treatment option. Recommendations are impossible for mycophenolate, montelukast, intravenous immunoglobulins, and systemic glucocorticosteroids because of limited evidence. A meta-analysis was not performed because of a lack of standardization in outcome measures. Conclusion Although 12 different interventions for moderate-to-severe AD have been studied in 34 RCTs, strong recommendations are only possible for the short-term use of cyclosporin A. Methodological limitations in the majority of trials prevent evidence-based conclusions. Large head-to-head trials evaluating long-term treatments are required.
机译:背景许多中度至重度特应性皮炎(AD)的患者需要全身免疫调节治疗以实现适当的疾病控制。目的我们试图系统评价中重度AD全身治疗的疗效和安全性。方法在MEDLINE,EMBASE和CENTRAL(至2012年6月)中进行系统的文献检索。包括评估中度至重度AD的全身免疫调节治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。由2位审阅者独立进行选择,数据提取,质量评估和使用推荐分级评定,发展和评估(GRADE)方法生成治疗推荐。疗效结果为临床体征,症状,生活质量和AD病程。通过计算每周的不良事件发生率(百分比)来比较安全性数据。结果纳入了24项接受12种不同全身治疗的RCT,共1653例患者。十四项试验一致表明,环孢菌素A有效改善了AD的临床体征。建议将环孢菌素A作为短期治疗的一线治疗。二线治疗选择是硫唑嘌呤,但疗效较低,证据较弱。甲氨蝶呤可以被视为三线治疗选择。由于证据有限,对麦考酚酸酯,孟鲁司特,静脉注射免疫球蛋白和全身性糖皮质激素的建议是不可能的。由于结局指标缺乏标准化,因此未进行荟萃分析。结论尽管在34项RCT中研究了12种不同的中重度AD干预措施,但强烈建议仅可短期使用环孢菌素A。大多数试验的方法学局限性阻止了循证结论。需要评估长期治疗的大型头对头试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号