首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of artificial organs >Patient and kidney survival by dialysis modality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.
【24h】

Patient and kidney survival by dialysis modality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.

机译:重症急性肾损伤患者的透析方式可提高患者和肾脏的存活率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using a large, international cohort, we sought to determine the effect of initial technique of renal replacement therapy (RRT) on the outcome of acute renal failure (ARF) in the intensive care unit (ICU). We enrolled 1218 patients treated with continuous RRT (CRRT) or intermittent RRT (IRRT) for ARF in 54 ICUs in 23 countries. We obtained demographic, biochemical and clinical data and followed patients to either death or hospital discharge. Information was analyzed to assess the independent impact of treatment choice on survival and renal recovery. Patients treated first with CRRT (N=1006, 82.6%) required vasopressor drugs and mechanical ventilation more frequently compared to those receiving IRRT (N=212, 17.4%), (p<0.0001). Unadjusted hospital survival was lower (35.8% vs. 51.9%, p<0.0001). However, unadjusted dialysis-independence at hospital discharge was higher after CRRT (85.5% vs. 66.2%, p<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression showed that choice of CRRT was not an independent predictor of hospital survival or dialysis-free hospital survival. However, the choice of CRRT was a predictor of dialysis independence at hospital discharge among survivors (OR: 3.333, 95% CI: 1.845 - 6.024, p<0.0001). Further adjustment using a propensity score did not significantly change these results. We conclude that worldwide, the choice of CRRT as initial therapy is not a predictor of hospital survival or dialysis-free hospital survival but is an independent predictor of renal recovery among survivors.
机译:我们使用一个大型的国际队列,试图确定初始肾脏替代治疗(RRT)技术对重症监护病房(ICU)急性肾衰竭(ARF)结局的影响。我们在23个国家的54个ICU中招募了1218例接受连续RRT(CRRT)或间歇性RRT(IRRT)治疗的ARF患者。我们获得了人口统计,生化和临床数据,并追踪了患者的死亡或出院情况。分析信息以评估治疗选择对生存和肾脏恢复的独立影响。与接受IRRT的患者(N = 212,17.4%)相比,首先接受CRRT治疗的患者(N = 1006,82.6%)更需要血管加压药和机械通气(p <0.0001)。未经调整的医院生存率较低(35.8%比51.9%,p <0.0001)。但是,CRRT后出院时未经调整的透析独立性较高(85.5%比66.2%,p <0.0001)。多变量logistic回归表明,CRRT的选择不是医院生存或无透析医院生存的独立预测指标。然而,CRRT的选择是幸存者住院出院时透析独立性的预测指标(OR:3.333,95%CI:1.845-6.024,p <0.0001)。使用倾向评分进行的进一步调整不会明显改变这些结果。我们得出的结论是,在全球范围内,选择CRRT作为初始治疗方法不能预测医院生存或无透析医院生存,而可以预测幸存者中肾脏恢复的独立性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号