Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis

Zhou Jing; Xiong Bing Hong; Ma Li; Cheng Yong; Huang Wei; Zhao Lin

首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS >Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis

【24h】

Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis

机译：机器人与腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术的荟萃分析

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

BackgroundTo evaluate whether the safety and efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) in patients with cervical cancer (CC) are equivalent to those of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH).

机译：背景为了评估机器人根治性子宫切除术（RRH）在宫颈癌（CC）患者中的安全性和有效性是否等同于腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术（LRH）。

著录项

来源
《The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS》 |2016年第1期|共10页
作者
Zhou Jing; Xiong Bing Hong; Ma Li; Cheng Yong; Huang Wei; Zhao Lin;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类外科学;
关键词
cervical cancer; robotic; laparoscopy; radical hysterectomy; meta-analysis;

机译：宫颈癌;机器人;腹腔镜;根治性子宫切除术;Meta分析;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer [J] . Jin Yue-Mei, Liu Shan-Shan, Chen Jun, Journal of land use science . 2018,第1a3期

机译：机器人自由基子宫切除术优于腹腔镜自由基子宫切除术和宫颈癌治疗中的开放自由基子宫切除术
2. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction [J] . Wu Jiayue, Ye Taiyang, Lv Jianwei, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology . 2019,第3期

机译：腹腔镜神经滥本自由基子宫切除术对宫颈癌的腹腔镜自由基子宫切除术：临床疗效和膀胱功能障碍的系统综述与荟萃分析
3. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy [J] . Cheng Luo, Mei Liu, Xiuli Li BMC Women s Health . 2018,第1期

机译：与腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术相比，中国老年宫颈癌女性机器人根治性子宫切除术的疗效和安全性结果
4. Optimization of Family Support in Improving Resilience of Cervical Cancer Client Post Radical Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingo Oophorectomy Undergoing Chemotherapy [C] . Esti Yunitasari International Nursing Conference on Education, Practice and Research Development in Nursing . 2017

机译：各种家庭支持改善宫颈癌客户端术后颈椎子宫切除术和双边沙坪卵巢切除术治疗化疗
5. Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding cervical cancer and screening and perceived barriers to cervical cancer screening programs among Thai immigrant women living in Germany. [D] . Ice, Unchalee Vatanasook. 2012

机译：在德国居住的泰国移民妇女中有关宫颈癌和筛查的知识，态度和信念以及对宫颈癌筛查计划的认知障碍。
6. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer [O] . Yue-Mei Jin, Shan-Shan Liu, Jun Chen, -1

机译：在宫颈癌的治疗中机器人根治性子宫切除术优于腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术和开放性根治性子宫切除术
7. Concurrent Learning Curves of 3-Dimensional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Using 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy as a Benchmark: A Single Surgeon’s Experience [O] . Ding Ding, Hongyuan Jiang, Jichan Nie, 2019

机译：二维腹腔镜自由基子宫切除术作为基准的三维和机器人辅助腹腔镜自由基子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的并发学习曲线：单一外科医生的经验

Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅