首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of health planning and management >A hybrid health service accreditation program model incorporating mandated standards and continuous improvement: interview study of multiple stakeholders in Australian health care
【24h】

A hybrid health service accreditation program model incorporating mandated standards and continuous improvement: interview study of multiple stakeholders in Australian health care

机译:包含强制性标准和持续改进的混合健康服务认证计划模型:对澳大利亚医疗保健多个利益相关者的访谈研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The study aim was to investigate the understandings and concerns of stakeholders regarding the evolution of health service accreditation programs in Australia. Stakeholder representatives from programs in the primary, acute and aged care sectors participated in semi-structured interviews. Across 2011-12 there were 47 group and individual interviews involving 258 participants. Interviews lasted, on average, 1 h, and were digitally recorded and transcribed. Transcriptions were analysed using textual referencing software. Four significant issues were considered to have directed the evolution of accreditation programs: altering underlying program philosophies; shifting of program content focus and details; different surveying expectations and experiences and the influence of external contextual factors upon accreditation programs. Three accreditation program models were noted by participants: regulatory compliance; continuous quality improvement and a hybrid model, incorporating elements of these two. Respondents noted the compatibility or incommensurability of the first two models. Participation in a program was reportedly experienced as ranging on a survey continuum from "malicious compliance" to "performance audits" to "quality improvement journeys". Wider contextual factors, in particular, political and community expectations, and associated media reporting, were considered significant influences on the operation and evolution of programs. A hybrid accreditation model was noted to have evolved. The hybrid model promotes minimum standards and continuous quality improvement, through examining the structure and processes of organisations and the outcomes of care. The hybrid model appears to be directing organisational and professional attention to enhance their safety cultures. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:该研究的目的是调查利益相关者对澳大利亚卫生服务认证计划演变的理解和关注。来自初级,急性和老年护理部门计划的利益相关者代表参加了半结构化访谈。在2011-12年度,共有47个小组和个人访谈,涉及258名参与者。访谈平均持续1小时,并进行数字记录和转录。使用文本参考软件分析转录。人们认为有四个重要问题指导了认证计划的发展:改变基本计划的理念;节目内容重点和细节的转移;不同的调查期望和经验以及外部环境因素对认证计划的影响。与会者指出了三种认证计划模型:合规性;持续的质量改进和混合模型,结合了这两个要素。受访者指出前两种模型的兼容性或不可比性。据报道,参加该计划的经历涉及从“恶意合规”到“绩效审核”再到“质量改进之旅”的连续调查。广泛的背景因素,特别是政治和社区期望,以及相关的媒体报道,被认为对计划的运作和发展具有重大影响。注意到混合认证模型已经发展。混合模型通过检查组织的结构和过程以及护理结果来促进最低标准和持续质量改进。混合模型似乎正在引导组织和专业人士注意,以增强他们的安全文化。版权所有(C)2015 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号