...
首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of human resource management >Comparing and explaining HR department effectiveness assessments: Evidence from line managers and trade union representatives
【24h】

Comparing and explaining HR department effectiveness assessments: Evidence from line managers and trade union representatives

机译:比较和解释人力资源部门的有效性评估:直线经理和工会代表的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We compare and explain effectiveness assessments of two HR stakeholders: line managers and trade union representatives. We examine whether they have the same preferences regarding the roles the HR department has to fulfil (Ulrich 1997). Next, we test which strong HRM system characteristics (Bowen and Ostroff 2004) are decisive in determining the perceived effectiveness of the HR department in the preferential roles. With these analyses we examine whether the HR roles and strong HRM system characteristics are equally important to different stakeholders. Results show that the perceived effectiveness of the HR department in its operational roles is decisive in trade union representatives' general HR effectiveness assessment. For line managers, process-oriented roles are crucial. Next, if the HR department scores high on strong HRM system characteristics, it is perceived as more effective in its HR roles. Yet, the importance of specific HRM system characteristics depends on the role and stakeholder.
机译:我们比较并解释了两个人力资源利益相关者的有效性评估:直线经理和工会代表。我们检查了他们对于人力资源部门必须履行的职责是否有相同的偏好(Ulrich 1997)。接下来,我们测试哪些强大的人力资源管理系统特征(Bowen和Ostroff 2004)对于确定人力资源部门在优先岗位上的有效性具有决定性作用。通过这些分析,我们研究了人力资源角色和强大的人力资源管理系统特征对于不同的利益相关者是否同样重要。结果表明,人力资源部门在其运营角色中的感知效率对工会代表的总体人力资源效率评估具有决定性作用。对于直属经理来说,面向过程的角色至关重要。接下来,如果人力资源部门在强大的HRM系统特性方面得分很高,则可以认为它在人力资源角色方面更为有效。然而,具体的人力资源管理系统特征的重要性取决于角色和利益相关者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号