首页> 外文学位 >The legal status of representative trade unions: On the complicated relation between the legal status of trade unions and the right to collective action (Belgium, Dutch text).
【24h】

The legal status of representative trade unions: On the complicated relation between the legal status of trade unions and the right to collective action (Belgium, Dutch text).

机译:代表工会的法律地位:关于工会的法律地位与集体诉讼权之间的复杂关系(比利时,荷兰文本)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Ph.D. thesis seeks to examine the relation between the legal status of (representative) trade unions and their right to collective action. The question arises whether and to what extent the legal form provided of imposed by the State might jeopardise their right to collective action.; The subject focuses on the legal status of Belgian representative trade unions, which are said to ‘refuse’ corporate personality and to be mere factual associations. The aforementioned communis opinio is questioned in a critical way.; The thesis seeks to prove that Belgian trade unions are not deprived of legal capacity and that they are not situated in a vacuum iuris . The author confirms that these associations have a limited legal capacity and cannot be held liable (in tort) for wrongful collective action.; The central question is analysed in a comparative way, according to German, Dutch and French law. Furthermore the issue is examined in the light of international legal standards concerning human rights (ILO conventions, UNO-Conventions, Council of Europe Conventions).; The thesis offers insight into various fundamental topics, e.g. (1) legal theory: definition of corporate persons, legal capacity, subjective rights, legal order, institutional theory (Romano, Hauriou, Renard etc); (2) the definition of trade unions; (3) the problem of representativity of trade unions; (4) the Public Organisation of the Economy; (5) the limits of the right to collective action; (6) internal functioning of associations; (7) legal representation of groups of persons; (8) liability of groups for wrongful collective action; The subject matter is treated according to labour law, law of contractual obligations, tort law, constitutional law, international law, legal theory, administrative law, corporate law Furthermore, the problem is situated in a broad perspective of history and history of law.
机译:博士本论文旨在研究(代表)工会的法律地位与其集体诉讼权之间的关系。提出的问题是,国家规定的法律形式是否以及在何种程度上会危害其采取集体行动的权利。该主题着重于比利时代表工会的法律地位,据说工会“拒绝”公司人格,并且仅仅是事实协会。前面提到的 communis opinio 受到批评。本文试图证明比利时工会没有被剥夺法律行为能力,并且不位于 vacuum iuris 中。作者确认,这些协会的法律行为能力有限,因此不应对不当的集体诉讼负责(侵权)。根据德国,荷兰和法国的法律,以比较的方式分析了中心问题。此外,还根据有关人权的国际法律标准(国际劳工组织的公约,联合国日内瓦公约,欧洲理事会的公约)对这一问题进行了审查。论文提供了对各种基本主题的见解,例如(1)法律理论:法人的定义,法律行为能力,主观权利,法律秩序,制度理论(罗曼诺,豪里乌,雷纳德等); (2)工会的定义; (3)工会的代表性问题; (4)经济公共组织; (5)集体诉讼权的限制; (6)协会的内部运作; (7)团体的法律代表; (8)团体对错误集体行动的责任;该主题根据劳动法,合同义务法,侵权法,宪法,国际法,法律理论,行政法,公司法进行处理。此外,该问题还存在于历史和法律史的广阔视野中。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dorssemont, Filip.;

  • 作者单位

    Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen (Belgium).;

  • 授予单位 Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen (Belgium).;
  • 学科 Law.; Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 783 p.
  • 总页数 783
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;社会学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号