首页> 外文期刊>The European physical journal, B. Condensed matter physics >Coevolution of competing systems: local cooperation and global inhibition
【24h】

Coevolution of competing systems: local cooperation and global inhibition

机译:竞争系统的共同进化:地方合作和全球抑制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Using a set of heterogeneous competing systems with intra-system cooperation and inter-system aggression, we show how the coevolution of the system parameters (degree of organization and conditions for aggression) depends on the rate of supply of resources ˙S . The model consists of a number of units grouped into systems that compete for the resource S; within each system several units can be aggregated into cooperative arrangements whose size is a measure of the degree of organization in the system. Aggression takes place when the systems release inhibitors that impair the performance of other systems. Using a mean field approximation we show that i) even in the case of identical systems there are stable inhomogeneous solutions; ii) a system steadily producing inhibitors needs large perturbations to leave this regime; and iii) aggression may give comparative advantages. A discrete model is used in order to examine how the particular configuration of the units within a system determines its performance in the presence of aggression. We find that full-scale, one sided aggression is only profitable for less-organized systems, and that systems with a mixture of degrees of organization exhibit robustness against aggression. By using a genetic algorithm we find that, in terms of the full-occupation resource supply rate ˙SF , the coevolution of the set of systems displays the following behavior: i) for ˙S < ˙SF /10 aggressions are irrelevant and most systems exhibit a high degree of organization; ii) For ˙SF /10 < ˙ S < ˙SF /3 aggressions are frequent, making systems with a low degree of organization competitive; iii) for ˙SF /3 < ˙S < ˙SF /2 the systems display global evolutive transitions between periods of calm (few aggressions and high degree of organization) and periods of belligerence (frequent aggressions and low degree of organization); iv) for ˙S > ˙SF /2 the periods of aggression becomes progressively rarer and shorter. Finally, when ˙S approaches ˙SF the selection pressure on the cooperativity and the aggression between systems disappears. This kind of model can be useful to analyse the interplay of the cooperation/competition processes that can be found in some social, economic, ecological and biochemical systems; as an illustration we refer to the competition between drug-selling gangs.
机译:通过使用一组具有系统内合作和系统间侵略性的异构竞争系统,我们展示了系统参数(组织度和侵略条件)的协同演化如何取决于资源供应率˙S。该模型由多个单元组成,这些单元被分组为争夺资源S的系统;在每个系统中,可以将几个单元聚合为合作安排,其规模是系统中组织程度的度量。当系统释放削弱其他系统性能的抑制剂时,就会发生攻击。使用平均场近似,我们表明:i)即使在相同系统的情况下,也存在稳定的不均匀解; ii)稳定产生抑制剂的系统需要很大的干扰才能离开该体系; iii)侵略可能会带来比较优势。使用离散模型来检查系统内单元的特定配置如何在存在侵略的情况下确定其性能。我们发现,全面的,单方面的侵略只对组织较少的系统有利可图,而且组织程度不同的系统对侵略具有鲁棒性。通过使用遗传算法,我们发现,就全占用资源供给率˙SF而言,系统集合的协同进化表现出以下行为:i)对于˙S<˙SF/ 10的攻击是不相关的,并且大多数系统表现出高度的组织性; ii)对于˙SF/ 10 S <˙SF/ 3,攻击频繁,使得组织度较低的系统具有竞争力; iii)对于˙SF/ 3 <˙S<˙SF/ 2,系统显示出在平静时期(少有侵略和高度组织化)和好战时期(频繁侵略和低组织度)之间的全局演进过渡; iv)对于˙S>˙SF/ 2,侵略时间变得越来越少且越来越短。最后,当˙S接近˙SF时,对合作性的选择压力和系统之间的攻击性消失了。这种模型可用于分析在某些社会,经济,生态和生化系统中发现的合作/竞争过程之间的相互作用。作为说明,我们指的是贩毒帮派之间的竞争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号