...
首页> 外文期刊>The HUGO journal >The use of race, ethnicity and ancestry in human genetic research
【24h】

The use of race, ethnicity and ancestry in human genetic research

机译:种族,种族和血统在人类遗传研究中的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Post-Human Genome Project progress has enabled a new wave of population genetic research, and intensified controversy over the use of race/ethnicity in this work. At the same time, the development of methods for inferring genetic ancestry offers more empirical means of assigning group labels. Here, we provide a systematic analysis of the use of race/ethnicity and ancestry in current genetic research. We base our analysis on key published recommendations for the use and reporting of race/ethnicity which advise that researchers: explain why the terms/categories were used and how they were measured, carefully define them, and apply them consistently. We studied 170 population genetic research articles from high impact journals, published 2008-2009. A comparative perspective was obtained by aligning study metrics with similar research from articles published 2001-2004. Our analysis indicates a marked improvement in compliancewith some of the recommendations/guidelines for the use of race/ethnicity over time, while showing that important shortfalls still remain: no article using 'race', 'ethnicity' or 'ancestry' defined or discussed the meaning of these concepts in context; a third of articles still do not provide a rationale for their use, with those using 'ancestry' being the least likely to do so. Further, no article discussed potential socio-ethical implications of the reported research. As such, there remains a clear imperative for highlighting the importance of consistent and comprehensive reporting on human populations to the genetics/genomics community globally, to generate explicit guidelines for the uses of ancestry and genetic ancestry, and importantly, to ensure that guidelines are followed.
机译:人类后基因组计划的进展推动了新一轮的人口遗传学研究,并且在这项工作中对种族/民族的使用引发了越来越多的争议。同时,推断遗传血统的方法的发展提供了分配组标记的更多经验手段。在这里,我们提供了对种族/民族和血统在当前遗传研究中的使用的系统分析。我们的分析基于种族和民族的使用和报告的主要公开建议,这些建议建议研究人员:解释为什么使用术语/类别以及如何对其进行度量,仔细定义它们并一致地应用它们。我们研究了2008-2009年间发表在高影响力期刊上的170篇关于人群遗传学的文章。通过使研究指标与2001-2004年发表的文章中的类似研究保持一致,可以获得比较观点。我们的分析表明,随着时间的流逝,种族/族裔使用方面的一些建议/指南得到了显着改善,同时表明仍然存在重大不足:没有关于“种族”,“族裔”或“祖先”的文章进行定义或讨论。这些概念在上下文中的含义;三分之一的文章仍然没有提供使用它们的理由,而那些使用“祖先”的可能性最小。此外,没有文章讨论所报道研究的潜在社会伦理意义。因此,显然有必要强调向全球遗传学/基因组学界进行持续而全面的人口报告的重要性,以产生关于祖先和遗传祖先使用的明确指南,并且重要的是,确保遵循该指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号