首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences: le Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques >Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic daily headache.
【24h】

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic daily headache.

机译:多学科治疗计划对慢性每日头痛的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Chronic daily headache (CDH: headache on fifteen days a month or more) is one of the most common forms of chronic pain. The relative efficacy of different treatment methods for these patients needs to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment outcomes for patients with CDH treated in a traditional office-based pharmacological treatment program with a second group treated in a multidisciplinary management program. METHODS: Patient outcomes were measured using changes in the Headache Disability Inventory (HDI) and the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) over the treatment period. Outcomes from seventy patients treated in an office setting were compared to thirty-seven patients treated in a multidisciplinary headache treatment program. Both groups received similar pharmacological treatment. All patients treated in the office setting and the majority of patients in the multidisciplinary program had transformed migraine. RESULTS: Even though a reduction in headache days per month occurred, mean headache related disability (measured by HDI) and mean Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL measured by SF-36) did not improve for the patient group treated in the office setting but did improve significantly for the patient group treated in the multidisciplinary headache program. CONCLUSION: For patients with CDH, headache-related disability and HRQoL is more likely to improve with management in a multidisciplinary headache treatment program as compared to the traditional specialist consultation-family physician office-based setting.
机译:背景:慢性每日头痛(CDH:每月十五天或更长时间的头痛)是慢性疼痛的最常见形式之一。需要确定这些患者不同治疗方法的相对疗效。目的:比较在传统的基于办公室的药物治疗方案中治疗的CDH患者与在多学科管理方案中治疗的第二组患者的治疗结果。方法:使用治疗期间的头痛残疾清单(HDI)和Short-Form-36(SF-36)的变化测量患者的预后。将办公室环境中接受治疗的70名患者的结果与多学科头痛治疗计划中接受治疗的37名患者进行了比较。两组均接受相似的药理治疗。在办公室环境中治疗的所有患者以及多学科计划中的大多数患者已转变为偏头痛。结果:即使每月减少头痛天数,但在办公室环境中治疗的患者组的平均头痛相关残疾(通过HDI测量)和平均健康相关生活质量(通过SF-36测量的HRQoL)并没有改善,但在多学科头痛计划中治疗的患者组的确有明显改善。结论:对于CDH患者,与传统的基于专家咨询的家庭医生办公室为基础的环境相比,采用多学科头痛治疗计划进行治疗时,与头痛相关的残疾和HRQoL更有可能得到改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号