首页> 外文期刊>The Indian Journal of Agronomy >Response of rice (Oryza sativa) varieties to nitrogen under aerobic and flooded conditions.
【24h】

Response of rice (Oryza sativa) varieties to nitrogen under aerobic and flooded conditions.

机译:有氧和淹水条件下水稻品种对氮的响应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A field experiment was conducted on a sandy clay loam soil of Central Telangana Zone of Andhra Pradesh during rainy seasons of 2008 and 2009 to compare the performance of popular rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties, viz. 'MTU 1001', 'WGL 32100', 'WGL 14 'and 'WGL 3825' (check) under aerobic and flooded methods of water management and their response to levels of nitrogen viz. 120. 180 and 240 kg/ha. Cultivation of rice with aerobic method (3.49 t/ha) resulted in 29% yield reduction compared with flooded method (4.93 t/ha). Among the yield attributes, filled spikelets/panicle were significantly affected under aerobic method, while panicles/m2, test weight and harvest index were not influenced by the method of water management. 'WGL 32100' gave highest grain yield under aerobic (3.94 t/ha) with the least yield reduction (17%) compared to flooded method, while yield gap was high (40%) in 'MTU 1001'. The water-use efficiency was highest with 'WGL 32100' and aerobic method (3.4 kg/hamm), while flooded method showed more nitrogen-use efficiency (33.5 kg grain/kg nitrogen), and nitrogen uptake (76 kg/ha). Higher net returns (Rs 26,300/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.11) were realized with flood irrigated method. Application of 240 kg N/ha resulted in better yield attributes, increased yield (4.50 t/ha), N uptake (72 kg/ha), water-use efficiency (3.0 kg/ha-mm), net returns (Rs 23,062/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.21), whereas, the nitrogenuse efficiency was superior with 120 kg N/ha (32.5 kg grain/kg nitrogen) both under aerobic and flood irrigated conditions.
机译:在2008年和2009年的雨季期间,在安得拉邦中部Telangana地区的砂质壤土上进行了田间试验,比较了流行水稻(Oryza sativa L.)品种的性能。在有氧和水淹管理方法下的'MTU 1001','WGL 32100','WGL 14'和'WGL 3825'(检查)及其对氮水平的响应。 120. 180和240公斤/公顷。与淹水法(4.93 t / ha)相比,好氧法(3.49 t / ha)的水稻减产29%。在产量属性中,需氧方法对灌浆的小穗/穗数有显着影响,而水分管理方法对穗/ m 2 ,容重和收获指数没有影响。与淹水法相比,“ WGL 32100”在有氧条件下的谷物产量最高(3.94吨/公顷),而减价幅度最小(17%),而“ MTU 1001”的产量差距很高(40%)。 “ WGL 32100”和好氧法的水分利用效率最高(3.4 kg / hamm),淹水法的氮利用效率更高(33.5 kg谷物/ kg氮),而氮的吸收量高达76 kg / ha。通过洪水灌溉法实现了更高的净收益(26,300卢比/公顷)和收益:成本比(1.11)。施用240千克氮/公顷可获得更好的产量属性,增加的产量(4.50吨/公顷),吸收的氮(72千克/公顷),水分利用效率(3.0千克/公顷-毫米),净收益(23062卢比/卢比) ha)和效益:成本比(1.21),而在需氧灌溉和洪水灌溉条件下,氮素利用效率均优于120 kg N / ha(32.5 kg谷物/ kg氮)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号