首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Computed tomography-based validation of abdominal adiposity measurements from ultrasonography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry.
【24h】

Computed tomography-based validation of abdominal adiposity measurements from ultrasonography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry.

机译:基于计算机断层扫描的腹部超声测量,双能X线骨密度仪和人体测量学的验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Large-scale aetiological studies of obesity and its pathological consequences require accurate measurements of adipose mass, distribution and subtype. Here, we compared the validity of three abdominal obesity assessment methods (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), ultrasound and anthropometry) against the gold-standard method of computed tomography (CT) in twenty-nine non-diseased middle-aged men (BMI 26.5 (SD 3.1) kg/m2) and women (BMI 25.5 (SD 3.2) kg/m2). Assessments of adipose mass (kg) and distribution (total subcutaneous (TSAT), superficial subcutaneous (SSAT), deep subcutaneous (DSAT) and visceral (VAT)) were obtained. Spearman's correlations were performed adjusted for age and sex. VAT area that was assessed using ultrasound (r 0.79; P < 0.0001) and waist circumference (r 0.85; P < 0.0001) correlated highly with VAT from CT, as did BMI (r 0.67; P < 0.0001) and DXA (r 0.70; P < 0.0001). DXA (r 0.72; P = 0.0004), BMI (r 0.71; P = 0.0003), waist circumference (r 0.86; P < 0.0001) and ultrasound (r 0.52; P = 0.015) were less strongly correlated with CT TSAT. None of the comparison measures of DSAT was strongly correlated with CT DSAT (all r approximately 0.50; P < 0.02). BMI (r 0.76; P < 0.0001), waist circumference (r 0.65; P = 0.002) and DXA (r 0.75; P < 0.0001) were all fairly strongly correlated with the CT measure of SSAT, whereas ultrasound yielded a weaker yet statistically significant correlation (r 0.48; P = 0.03). Compared with CT, visceral and subcutaneous adiposity can be assessed with reasonable validity using waist circumference and BMI, respectively. Ultrasound or DXA does not generally provide substantially better measures of these traits. Highly valid assessments of DSAT do not appear to be possible with surrogate measures. These findings may help guide the selection of measures for epidemiological studies of obesity. Copyright (c) The Authors 2010.
机译:肥胖病及其病理后果的大规模病因学研究需要精确测量脂肪量,分布和亚型。在这里,我们比较了三种腹部肥胖评估方法(双能X线吸收法(DXA),超声和人体测量法)与29例无病中年人的CT黄金标准方法的有效性。男性(BMI 26.5(SD 3.1)kg / m2)和女性(BMI 25.5(SD 3.2)kg / m2)。评估了脂肪质量(kg)和分布(皮下总含量(TSAT),浅层皮下含量(SSAT),深层皮下含量(DSAT)和内脏含量(VAT))。 Spearman的相关性根据年龄和性别进行了调整。使用超声波评估的增值税面积(r 0.79; P <0.0001)和腰围(r 0.85; P <0.0001)与来自CT的增值税高度相关,BMI(r 0.67; P <0.0001)和DXA(r 0.70; P <0.0001)。 DXA(r 0.72; P = 0.0004),BMI(r 0.71; P = 0.0003),腰围(r 0.86; P <0.0001)和超声检查(r 0.52; P = 0.015)与CT TSAT的相关性较小。 DSAT的比较方法均未与CT DSAT紧密相关(所有r均约为0.50; P <0.02)。 BMI(r 0.76; P <0.0001),腰围(r 0.65; P = 0.002)和DXA(r 0.75; P <0.0001)与SSAT的CT量度均具有很强的相关性,而超声检查结果较弱,但具有统计学意义相关性(r 0.48; P = 0.03)。与CT相比,可以分别使用腰围和BMI评估内脏和皮下脂肪的合理性。超声波或DXA通常不能提供对这些特征的更好的测量。用替代措施似乎无法对DSAT进行高度有效的评估。这些发现可能有助于指导肥胖病流行病学研究方法的选择。版权所有(c)作者2010。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号