首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Dietary assessment methods for micronutrient intake: a systematic review on vitamins. (Special Issue: Dietary assessment methods for micronutrient intake: a systematic review of validation studies, the EURRECA Network of Excellence.)
【24h】

Dietary assessment methods for micronutrient intake: a systematic review on vitamins. (Special Issue: Dietary assessment methods for micronutrient intake: a systematic review of validation studies, the EURRECA Network of Excellence.)

机译:微量营养素摄入的饮食评估方法:对维生素的系统评价。 (特刊:微量营养素摄入的膳食评估方法:验证研究的系统综述,EURRECA卓越网络。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The EURRECA Network of Excellence is working towards the development of aligned micronutrient recommendations across Europe. The purpose of the present study was to define how to identify dietary intake validation studies in adults pertaining to vitamins. After establishing a search strategy, we conducted a MEDLINE and EMBASE literature review. A scoring system was developed to rate the quality of each validation study according to sample size, statistical methods, data collection procedure, seasonality and vitamin supplement use. This produced a quality index with possible scores obtained ranging from 0.5 to 7. Five thousand four-hundred and seventy-six papers were identified. The numbers meeting the inclusion criteria were: for vitamin A, 76; vitamin C, 108; vitamin D, 21; vitamin E, 75; folic acid, 47; vitamin B12, 19; vitamin B6, 21; thiamine, 49; riboflavin, 49; and niacin, 32. The most frequently used method to ascertain dietary intake was the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), whereas dietary records (DR) and 24-h recalls were the most used reference methods. The correlation coefficients (CC) between vitamin intakes estimated by FFQ and the reference method were weighted according to the study's quality index and ranged from 0.41 to 0.53 when the reference method was the DR and from 0.43 to 0.67 when the reference was 24-h recalls. A minority of studies (n 33) used biomarkers for validation and in these the CC ranged from 0.26 to 0.38. The FFQ is an acceptable method of assessing vitamin intake. The present review provides new insights regarding the characteristics that assessment methods for dietary intake should fulfil.
机译:EURRECA卓越网络正在努力在欧洲范围内制定一致的微量营养素推荐。本研究的目的是确定如何识别与维生素有关的成年人的饮食摄入量验证研究。建立搜索策略后,我们进行了MEDLINE和EMBASE文献综述。开发了一个评分系统,以根据样本量,统计方法,数据收集程序,季节性和维生素补充剂使用情况对每个验证研究的质量进行评分。这产生了质量指数,可能得分在0.5到7之间。共鉴定了546篇论文。符合纳入标准的数字是:维生素A为76;维生素C,108;维生素D,21;维生素E,75;叶酸47;维生素B 12 ,19;维生素B 6 ,21;硫胺素49;核黄素49;和烟酸,32.确定食物摄入量的最常用方法是食物频率调查表(FFQ),而饮食记录(DR)和24小时召回是最常用的参考方法。 FFQ估计的维生素摄入量与参考方法之间的相关系数(CC)根据研究的质量指数加权,当参考方法为DR时,其维权系数介于0.41至0.53之间;当参考方法为24小时召回时,其维生系数为0.43至0.67之间。 。少数研究( n 33)使用生物标志物进行验证,在这些研究中,CC的范围为0.26至0.38。 FFQ是评估维生素摄入量的可接受方法。本综述提供有关饮食摄入量评估方法应具备的特征的新见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号