首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of cardiology >Accuracy of the long-axis area-length method for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomography.
【24h】

Accuracy of the long-axis area-length method for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomography.

机译:使用多探测器计算机断层扫描技术测量左心室容积和射血分数的长轴面积长度法的准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is useful for assessing left ventricular (LV) volumes and function. Validation has mainly been carried out using Simpson's method of summing up consecutive short-axis areas. Because the latter method is time-consuming, many users prefer using a quicker method, based on a single view or a pair of views. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of the long-axis area-length method (AL), which has not been validated for MDCT, using Simpson's method as the gold standard, as well as right anterior oblique LV angiography as a clinical standard. METHODS: Twenty-three patients admitted with acute chest pain were clinically evaluated with electrocardiogram-gated MDCT and invasive LV angiography. MDCT-based end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes, and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated using Simpson's method, biplane AL and single-plane AL. For LV angiography, EF was calculated using single-plane AL. RESULTS: A Bland-Altman analysis showed a close agreement between biplane AL and Simpson's method for EF, with 1% underestimation, 95% CI of +/-11% and a correlation of 0.89. For end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes, overestimations of 7 mL, 4 mL and 2 mL, and 95% CI of +/-27 mL, +/-15 mL and +/-26 mL, respectively were found. Correlation coefficients were 0.95, 0.97 and 0.82, respectively. Comparisons with LV angiography were considerably weaker. The vertical long-axis AL method by MDCT correlated better with both LV angiography and Simpson's method than the horizontal long-axis AL method. CONCLUSIONS: The biplane AL method gives results for EF, which correspond closely with the more cumbersome Simpson's method, although volumes are slightly overestimated.
机译:背景:多排计算机断层扫描(MDCT)可用于评估左心室(LV)的体积和功能。验证主要使用辛普森的方法对连续的短轴区域求和。由于后一种方法很耗时,因此许多用户倾向于基于单个视图或一对视图使用更快的方法。目的:使用辛普森方法作为金标准,以及右前斜LV血管造影术作为临床标准,以评估尚未通过MDCT验证的长轴面积长度法(AL)的准确性。方法:对23例急性胸痛患者进行了心电图门控MDCT和有创LV血管造影术的临床评估。使用Simpson方法,双平面AL和单平面AL计算基于MDCT的舒张末期,收缩末期和搏动量以及射血分数(EF)。对于LV血管造影,EF是使用单平面AL计算的。结果:Bland-Altman分析显示双翼飞机AL与Simpson方法的EF密切相关,被低估了1%,CI为+/- 11%的95%,相关系数为0.89。对于舒张末期,收缩末期和中风量,分别高估了7 mL,4 mL和2 mL,以及95%CI的+/- 27 mL,+ /-15 mL和+/- 26 mL。相关系数分别为0.95、0.97和0.82。与LV血管造影的比较明显较弱。与水平长轴AL方法相比,MDCT的垂直长轴AL方法与LV血管造影和Simpson方法的相关性更好。结论:双平面AL方法给出了EF的结果,尽管体积被高估了,但它与较为繁琐的Simpson方法非常接近。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号