首页> 外文会议>2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference >Potential impact of hybrid CZT SPECT/CT imaging on estimation accuracy of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: A phantom study
【24h】

Potential impact of hybrid CZT SPECT/CT imaging on estimation accuracy of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: A phantom study

机译:混合CZT SPECT / CT成像对左心室容积和射血分数估计准确性的潜在影响:幻像研究

获取原文

摘要

The left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) are commonly calculated based on the partial volume effect (PVE) of gated single photon emission computerized tomography (G-SPECT) due to limited SPECT resolution. This study compares the accuracy of LV volume and EF quantification from a standard low resolution (LR) SPECT/CT system and a high resolution (HR) SPECT/CT system. Six custom-made cardiac phantoms each with a different inner and outer cylinder were used to simulate a wide range of LV volumes. The LV cavity (inner cylinder) was filled with water and the space between the inner and outer cylinders mimicking the LV myocardium was filled with Tc-99m solution. The cardiac phantom was inserted into a large cylindrical container filled with water. Images were acquired using a NaI/LR-SPECT/CT system (FWHM: 16 mm, GE Infinia) and a CZT/HR-SPECT/CT system (FWHM: 10 mm, GE D570c), and were reconstructed via the maximum likelihood expectation and maximization algorithm with CT-based attenuation correction. No photon scatter correction and post-filtering were applied to the images. The 6 sets of static SPECT images were aligned and assembled into an image sequence using our home-grown software to create 11-bin pseudo G-SPECT for a full cardiac cycle. Phantom volumes and EF were quantified using 4 different commercial software packages: Yale-Wackers-Liu CQ, Invia-Corridor4DM, Emory-Cardiac Toolbox and Cedars-Sinai-QGS. SPECT-quantified phantom volumes and EF were compared to the true phantom volumes and EF to evaluate the SPECT quantification accuracy. Quantification of LV volumes and EF from HR-SPECT using the 4 SPECT quantification software resulted in a significant underestimation of EF as compared to that from LR-SPECT, and also caused an erratic variation in the LV volume estimation. These findings were consistent for all 4 software. Current SPECT quantification software predominately based on the PVE may need to be adjusted to compensate for the improv- d spatial resolution associated with new HR-SPECT imaging.
机译:由于有限的SPECT分辨率,通常基于门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(G-SPECT)的部分体积效应(PVE)计算左心室(LV)体积和射血分数(EF)。这项研究比较了标准低分辨率(LR)SPECT / CT系统和高分辨率(HR)SPECT / CT系统中左室容积和EF定量的准确性。六个定制的心脏幻像分别具有不同的内部和外部圆柱体,用于模拟各种LV体积。 LV腔(内部圆柱体)充满水,而模仿LV心肌的内部圆柱体和外部圆柱体之间的空间充满Tc-99m溶液。将心脏幻像插入装有水的大圆柱容器中。使用NaI / LR-SPECT / CT系统(FWHM:16毫米,GE Infinia)和CZT / HR-SPECT / CT系统(FWHM:10毫米,GE D570c)采集图像,并通过最大似然预期进行重建以及基于CT的衰减校正的最大化算法。没有对图像应用光子散射校正和后置滤波。使用我们自己开发的软件将6组静态SPECT图像对齐并组装成一个图像序列,以创建11个bin的伪G-SPECT,用于整个心动周期。使用4种不同的商业软件包对幻影体积和EF进行了量化:Yale-Wackers-Liu CQ,Invia-Corridor4DM,Emory-Cardiac Toolbox和Cedars-Sinai-QGS。将经SPECT量化的体模体积和EF与真实体模体积和EF进行比较,以评估SPECT量化的准确性。使用4 SPECT定量软件对HR-SPECT进行的LV体积和EF定量与LR-SPECT相比,导致EF的显着低估,并且还导致LV体积估算的不稳定。这些发现对于所有4种软件都是一致的。当前可能主要需要调整基于PVE的SPECT定量软件,以补偿与新HR-SPECT成像相关的改进的空间分辨率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号