...
首页> 外文期刊>The East African medical journal >Comparison of intramuscular artemether and intravenous quinine in the treatment of Sudanese children with severe falciparum malaria.
【24h】

Comparison of intramuscular artemether and intravenous quinine in the treatment of Sudanese children with severe falciparum malaria.

机译:肌内蒿甲醚和静脉注射奎宁治疗苏丹儿童严重恶性疟疾的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of intramuscular artemether and intravenous quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria. DESIGN: An open randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: New Halfa Teaching Hospital, Eastern Sudan, in the period November 2001-January 2002. SUBJECTS: Forty one male and female children; 21 on artemether and 20 on quinine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fever clearance time, parasite clearance time, coma resolution time and side effects of the two drugs. RESULTS: The two groups (artemether and quinine) were well matched in the admission variable. The mean +/- (SD) fever clearance time was 30.5 +/- (20.9) hours in the artemether group, while it was 18.0 +/- (8.1) hours in the quinine group; the difference was highly significant (P=0.02). The mean parasite clearance time was shorter in the artemether group than in the quinine group, but it was not statistically significant, (16.0 vs. 22.4 hours; p>0.05). In comatose patients (three in the artemether group, three in the quinine group) the time of recovery from coma was significantly shorter in artemether group than in quinine group (12.5 vs. 20.16 hours; P<0.05). Recrudescence of P. falciparum (confirmed by polymerase chain reaction) occurred in one out of fifteen patients (6.6%) in the quinine group seen on day 28, which was successfully treated by sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine. In the quinine group, one patient died and one patient developed hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSION: Artemether caused faster parasite clearance than quinine, but quinine lowered the temperature in shorter time than artemether. The results obtained show that artemether can be used as safe and effective alternative drug for the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in the wake of the growing resistance to quinine in Sudan.
机译:目的:比较肌内蒿甲醚和静脉注射奎宁治疗严重恶性疟疾的疗效。设计:一项开放随机对照临床试验。地点:苏丹东部新哈法教学医院,时间为2001年11月至2002年1月。蒿甲醚为21,奎宁为20。主要观察指标:两种药物的发热清除时间,寄生虫清除时间,昏迷消退时间和副作用。结果:两组(蒿甲醚和奎宁)在入院变量上均匹配良好。蒿甲醚组的平均+/-(SD)发烧清除时间为30.5 +/-(20.9)小时,奎宁组为18.0 +/-(8.1)小时。差异非常显着(P = 0.02)。蒿甲醚组的平均寄生虫清除时间短于奎宁组,但无统计学意义(16.0 vs. 22.4小时; p> 0.05)。在昏迷患者中(蒿甲醚组三例,奎宁组三例),蒿甲醚组的昏迷恢复时间明显短于奎宁组(12.5 vs. 20.16小时; P <0.05)。在第28天时,奎宁组的15名患者中有1名(6.6%)发生了恶性疟原虫的复发(经聚合酶链反应确认),已成功用磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶治疗。在奎宁组中,一名患者死亡,一名患者出现低血糖症。结论:蒿甲醚引起的寄生虫清除速度比奎宁快,但是奎宁在短时间内比蒿甲醚降低了温度。获得的结果表明,随着苏丹对奎宁的抗药性增强,蒿甲醚可以用作治疗严重恶性疟疾的安全有效的替代药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号