首页> 外文期刊>Chest: The Journal of Circulation, Respiration and Related Systems >Point: The Texas advance directives act effectively and ethically resolves disputes about medical futility.
【24h】

Point: The Texas advance directives act effectively and ethically resolves disputes about medical futility.

机译:要点:德克萨斯州的预先医疗指示有效且合乎道德地解决了关于医疗徒劳的争议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This clinical scenario is familiar to physicians, nurses, and other health-care professionals who treat seriously ill patients. Although we prefer the role of Asclepios, in some cases we take on the role of the Danaides attempting to fill a leaking cistern. Our patient cannot recover enough to live free from the hospital, is either suffering or unable to appreciate any joy in being alive, and cannot die easily or peacefully without permission. We conclude that further aggressive treatment is futile. Most surrogates will agree and may have come to the same sad conclusion before the physician. On occasion, however, that permission is not forthcoming, as in this case, and we no longer face the problem of medical futility; we face a medical futility conflict.
机译:这种临床情况对于治疗重病患者的医生,护士和其他卫生保健专业人员来说是熟悉的。尽管我们更喜欢Asclepios的角色,但在某些情况下,我们还是扮演Danaides的角色,试图填补一个漏水的水箱。我们的患者无法康复到足以免费出院生活,正在遭受折磨或无法享受到活着的喜悦,并且在未经允许的情况下无法轻易或和平地死亡。我们得出结论,进一步的积极治疗是徒劳的。大多数代理人都会同意,并且可能在医师面前得出同样可悲的结论。但是,在这种情况下,有时甚至没有这种许可,我们不再面临医疗徒劳的问题;我们面临医疗徒劳的冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号