...
首页> 外文期刊>The clinical journal of pain >Combining cognitive-behavioral therapy and milnacipran for fibromyalgia: A feasibility randomized-controlled trial
【24h】

Combining cognitive-behavioral therapy and milnacipran for fibromyalgia: A feasibility randomized-controlled trial

机译:认知行为疗法与米那普仑联合治疗纤维肌痛:一项可行性随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a randomized-controlled trial and to obtain estimates of the effects of combined cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and milnacipran for the treatment of fibromyalgia. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with fibromyalgia were randomized to 1 of the 3 treatment arms: (1) combination therapy (n=20); (2) milnacipran+education (n=19); and (3) placebo+CBT (n=19). Patients received either milnacipran (100 mg/d) or placebo. Patients also received 8 sessions of phone-delivered CBT or educational instructions, but only from baseline to week 9. Assessments were conducted at baseline, week 9, and 21. The primary endpoints were baseline to week 21 changes in weekly average pain intensity and physical function (SF-36 physical function scale). RESULTS: Compared with milnacipran, combination therapy demonstrated a moderate effect on improving SF-36 physical function (SE=9.42 [5.48], P=0.09, effect size=0.60) and in reducing weekly average pain intensity (mean difference [SE]=-1.18 [0.62], P=0.07, effect size=0.67). Compared with milnacipran, CBT had a moderate to large effect in improving SF-36 physical function (mean difference [SE]=11.0 [5.66], P=0.06, effect size=0.70). Despite the presence of concomitant centrally acting therapies, dropout rate was lower than anticipated (15% at week 21). Importantly, at least 6 out of the 8 phone-based therapy sessions were successfully completed by 89% of the patients; and adherence to the treatment protocols was >95%. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, a therapeutic approach that combines phone-based CBT and milnacipran was feasible and acceptable. Moreover, the preliminary data supports conducting a fully powered randomized-controlled trial.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01038323.
机译:目的:评估一项随机对照试验的可行性,并获得联合认知行为疗法(CBT)和米那普仑联合治疗纤维肌痛的疗效评估。方法:将58例肌纤维痛患者随机分为3个治疗组中的1个:(1)联合治疗(n = 20); (2)米那普仑+教育(n = 19); (3)安慰剂+ CBT(n = 19)。患者接受米那普仑(100 mg / d)或安慰剂。患者还接受了8次电话传递的CBT或教育指导,但仅限于从基线到第9周。评估是在基线,第9周和第21周进行的。主要终点是第21周的基线,即每周平均疼痛强度和身体状况的变化。功能(SF-36物理功能量表)。结果:与米那普仑相比,联合治疗对改善SF-36身体机能(SE = 9.42 [5.48],P = 0.09,效果大小= 0.60)和降低每周平均疼痛强度(平均差异[SE] = -1.18 [0.62],P = 0.07,效果大小= 0.67)。与米那普仑相比,CBT在改善SF-36身体机能方面具有中度至大的效果(平均差[SE] = 11.0 [5.66],P = 0.06,效果大小= 0.70)。尽管同时有中枢疗法,但辍学率仍低于预期(第21周时为15%)。重要的是,在8个基于电话的治疗中,至少有6个成功完成了89%的患者。对治疗方案的依从性> 95%。结论:在该初步研究中,结合电话基CBT和米那普仑的治疗方法是可行且可接受的。此外,初步数据支持进行完全有力的随机对照试验。临床试验注册:NCT01038323。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号