首页> 外文学位 >An efficacy study of group and individual cognitive-behavioral therapy combined with pharmacotherapy in the treatment of major depression.
【24h】

An efficacy study of group and individual cognitive-behavioral therapy combined with pharmacotherapy in the treatment of major depression.

机译:团体和个人认知行为疗法联合药物疗法治疗重度抑郁症的疗效研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study was designed to address the following hypothesis: "Is there a significant difference in effectiveness of individual or group cognitive-behavioral therapy in treating moderately and severely depressed outpatients?" A field practice outpatient setting was utilized. The 30 subjects scored 20 or above on the Beck Depression Inventory, 14 or higher on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, had a T score above 70 on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-D scale, and met the DSM III-R criteria for major depression. The 26 patients continuing treatment beyond four weeks included 7 males and 19 females ages 22-70. They were treated for 12 weeks in one of three modalities: (a) individual cognitive-behavioral therapy with pharmacotherapy, (b) group cognitive-behavioral therapy with pharmacotherapy, or (c) pharmacotherapy only.;Intake and outcome measurements included two well established self rating scales, the BDI and MMPI-D, and one clinician scale, the HRSD which was also used at midpoint by the psychiatrist.;Three treatment methods were utilized for comparative purposes. An analysis of variance performed on initial scores of the three dependent measures established no systematic bias of patients to treatment with regard to severity.;All patients were prescribed specific medications according to individual symptomatologies and drug characteristics as a common clinic procedure. Neither type nor dosage was limited. Medication monitoring included obtaining drug levels. The cognitive-behavioral component was based on principles and goals in David Burns' Feeling Good.;Low attrition rates were noted especially in cognitive-behavioral therapy modalities where one patient from each discontinued treatment. In the pharmacotherapy group, two subjects dropped.;Study findings indicated significant change in all treatment modalities on each scale with no significant differences delineated between the treatment modes. No significant difference between the groups was found at midpoint as measured by the HRSD or any of the three outcome measures at termination.;It is concluded that a basis for including cognitive-behavioral therapy in group format is substantiated for moderate and severely depressed outpatients. Individual cognitive-behavioral therapy combined with pharmacotherapy and pharmacotherapy alone were equally efficacious, at least in the initial treatment period.
机译:该研究旨在解决以下假设:“在治疗中度和重度抑郁的门诊病人时,个人或团体认知行为疗法的有效性是否存在显着差异?”利用了现场实践的门诊设置。在贝克抑郁量表上得分为20或以上,在汉密尔顿抑郁量表上得分为14或更高,在明尼苏达州多相人格量表-D量表上的T得分高于70,并符合DSM III-R重大标准的30名受试者萧条。持续治疗超过四周的26例患者包括7例男性和19例22-70岁的女性。他们采用以下三种方式之一治疗了12周:(a)药物疗法的个体认知行为疗法,(b)药物疗法的组认知行为疗法,或(c)药物疗法;摄入量和结局指标包括两种公认的方法自我评估量表,BDI和MMPI-D,以及一个临床医生量表,HRSD,也由精神科医生使用。三种治疗方法用于比较。对三项相关措施的初始评分进行的方差分析没有建立患者对严重性治疗的系统偏见。所有患者均根据个体症状和药物特点开具特定药物的处方,作为常见的临床程序。类型和剂量均不受限制。药物监测包括获得药物水平。认知行为组成部分基于David Burns的《感觉良好》中的原则和目标。尤其是在认知行为疗法中,每位患者中止治疗的一名患者的损耗率很低。在药物治疗组中,有两个受试者下降。研究结果表明,每种规模的所有治疗方式均发生了显着变化,各治疗方式之间无明显差异。通过HRSD或终止时的三种结局指标中的任何一项,在中点时两组之间无显着差异。结论:对于中度和重度抑郁的门诊患者,将认知行为疗法纳入组形式的依据已得到证实。至少在初始治疗阶段,单独的认知行为疗法与药物治疗和药物治疗相结合是同样有效的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Johnson, Susan Claire.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 School counseling.;Educational psychology.;Psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1989
  • 页码 261 p.
  • 总页数 261
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:50:40

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号