...
【24h】

A survey of psychological assessment on interdisciplinary craniofacial teams.

机译:跨学科颅面团队的心理评估调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective : To explore the role of mental health professionals on craniofacial teams and determine how craniofacial teams assess for psychological concerns in their patient populations. Design : Online and paper surveys. Participants : A total of 55 craniofacial team coordinators and 40 mental health professionals who are team members participated in this study. Results : Results indicated that teams in 2007 generally viewed psychological services on their teams similarly to teams assessed in 1987. Most teams do not use formal measures in their assessment of psychological concerns, and they provide feedback via discussions with the families. Mental health professionals assess a wide variety of potential areas of concern and are generally satisfied with the referral sources available to their patients. Conclusions : Craniofacial teams appear to practice in a manner consistent with professional standards, and these teams seem to value the inclusion of mental health professionals as part of the interdisciplinary team. Implications and limitations including response rate are discussed.
机译:目的:探讨精神卫生专业人员在颅面团队中的作用,并确定颅面团队如何评估患者人群中的心理问题。设计:在线和纸质调查。参加者:共有55名颅面小组协调员和40名小组成员心理健康专业人员参加了本研究。结果:结果表明,与1987年评估的团队类似,2007年的团队总体上看待其团队的心理服务。大多数团队在评估心理问题时不使用正式的方法,而是通过与家人的讨论来提供反馈。精神卫生专业人员评估各种潜在的关注领域,并且通常对患者可获得的推荐来源感到满意。结论:颅面团队似乎以与专业标准相一致的方式进行练习,并且这些团队似乎重视将精神卫生专业人员纳入跨学科团队。讨论和限制,包括响应率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号