...
首页> 外文期刊>The American surgeon. >Comparison of a Flexible-tip Laparoscope with a Rigid Straight Laparoscope for Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
【24h】

Comparison of a Flexible-tip Laparoscope with a Rigid Straight Laparoscope for Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

机译:硬性腹腔镜与硬性腹腔镜在单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study assessed whether a flexible-tip laparoscope improves operative outcomes including operative length while performing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) compared with the use of a conventional straight laparoscope. The flexible-tip laparoscope decreased the operative time compared with the straight laparoscope. Although SILC has potential benefits, surgeons experience problems for in-line viewing through a laparoscope and from contact of instruments with the laparoscope, resulting in longer operative times and the need for additional ports. The aim of this study was to determine whether a flexible-tip laparoscope improves operative outcomes, including operative length and the rate of insertion of additional ports, while performing SILC compared with the use of a conventional rigid straight laparoscope. We reviewed data on patients for whom we performed SILC at the Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, for the period from November 1, 2009, to February 28, 2013. The information was assessed with respect to patient characteristics, types of laparoscope used, operative data as well as postoperative outcomes. Operating time for SILC using the flexible-tip laparoscope was significantly shorter than with the straight laparoscope (81.5 6 23.2 vs 94.4 6 21.1 minutes) as a result of a better view of the operating field without contact with working instruments. Although a trend was shown toward a reduced rate of the need for extra ports in the flexible-tip laparoscope group, the difference did not reach statistical significance. Using the flexible-tip laparoscope solved the problem of in-line viewing and decreased the operative time for SILC.
机译:这项研究评估了与传统的直式腹腔镜相比,柔性尖端腹腔镜在进行单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)时是否改善了手术结局,包括手术长度。与笔直式腹腔镜相比,柔性腹腔镜减少了手术时间。尽管SILC具有潜在的好处,但外科医生在通过腹腔镜进行在线查看以及仪器与腹腔镜接触时会遇到问题,从而导致更长的手术时间并需要额外的端口。这项研究的目的是确定与传统的刚性直式腹腔镜相比,在进行SILC的同时,柔性尖端腹腔镜是否可以改善手术结果,包括手术长度和附加端口的插入率。我们审查了自2009年11月1日至2013年2月28日在关西医科大学外科进行SILC的患者的数据。该信息是根据患者特征,使用的腹腔镜类型,手术数据以及术后结果。使用软头腹腔镜进行SILC的手术时间比直腹腔镜的手术时间显着缩短(81.5 6 23.2 vs 94.4 6 21.1分钟),因为可以更好地观察手术视野,而无需接触工作器械。尽管显示了一种趋势,即在柔性尖端腹腔镜组中,对额外端口的需求率降低了,但这种差异并未达到统计学意义。使用柔性尖端腹腔镜解决了在线观看的问题,并减少了SILC的手术时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号