首页> 外文期刊>The American surgeon. >Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed Via the 'Marionette' Technique Shows Equivalence in Outcome and Cost to Standard Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Selected Patient Population
【24h】

Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed Via the 'Marionette' Technique Shows Equivalence in Outcome and Cost to Standard Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Selected Patient Population

机译:通过“牵线木偶”技术进行的单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术显示出与选定患者群体中标准四口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果和成本相当

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of our study is to compare single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) performed using the "marionette" technique (m-SILC), to the standard four-port technique [four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC)]. Patient information was extracted from a prospectively maintained database (n 5 188). Our primary endpoint was operative costs (determined by operating time and instruments used). Secondary endpoints were length of stay, operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complication rates. Univariate and adjusted multivariate analysis was used to compare the outcomes. There were a total of 188 patients for this study. Gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and resident participation were similar. Patients undergoing m-SILC were younger (43.8 vs 49.8 years old), less likely to have cholangiogram (32% vs 54%), and were more likely to undergo cholecystectomy for chronic cholecystitis (73.3% vs 52%). In univariate analysis, cholecystectomy performed by the "marionette method" as compared with the 4PLC was associated with shorter operative time (67 vs 59 minutes respectively) and shorter hospital stay (1.2 vs 2.08 days respectively). In multivariate analysis, SILC was associated with shorter hospital stay and comparable operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complications. Instrumentation cost was less in SILC (by $94). SILC done by an experienced surgeon with the "marionette" technique on a carefully selected population shows a statistically significant cost benefit while maintaining clinically comparable outcomes to the standard 4PLC. The surgical world changed with the laparoscopic revolution in the 1980s. The first video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy described in literature was performed by Muhle in 1985 and was met with much opposition. Because its advent and increasing popularity, numerous studies have shown laparoscopic cholecystectomy to be superior to its open counterpart in regards to hospital stay, operative time, opiate use, and overall cost. In 1992, the National Institute of Health consensus statement recognized laparoscopic cholecystectomy as "the treatment of choice for many patients." The first single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) was performed in 1995.3 Since that time, over 40 studies have been published, and over 1100 patients underwent SILC in these studies.
机译:我们研究的目的是比较使用“牵线木偶”技术(m-SILC)进行的单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)与标准的四端口技术[四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(4PLC)]。从前瞻性维护的数据库中提取患者信息(n 5 188)。我们的主要终点是手术成本(由手术时间和使用的器械确定)。次要终点为住院时间,手术时间,失血量和术后并发症发生率。使用单因素和调整后的多因素分析来比较结果。本研究共有188名患者。性别,体重指数,美国麻醉医师学会课程和居民参与情况相似。进行m-SILC的患者年龄较小(43.8岁对49.8岁),胆管造影的可能性较小(32%对54%),慢性胆囊炎的胆囊切除术可能性更高(73.3%对52%)。在单因素分析中,与4PLC相比,通过“木偶法”进行的胆囊切除术与手术时间较短(分别为67分钟和59分钟)和较短的住院时间(分别为1.2天和2.08天)相关。在多变量分析中,SILC与住院时间短和可比较的手术时间,失血量及术后并发症相关。 SILC的仪器成本更低(减少了94美元)。由经验丰富的外科医生使用“木偶”技术对精心挑选的人群进行的SILC显示出具有统计学意义的成本优势,同时保持了与标准4PLC相当的临床可比结果。外科世界随着1980年代的腹腔镜革命而改变。文献中描述的第一例电视腹腔镜胆囊切除术是由Muhle在1985年进行的,遭到了很多反对。由于它的出现和日益普及,许多研究表明,就住院时间,手术时间,鸦片使用和总体费用而言,腹腔镜胆囊切除术优于开放式胆囊切除术。在1992年,美国国家卫生研究院的共识声明将腹腔镜胆囊切除术视为“许多患者的首选治疗方法”。 1995年进行了第一例单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)。3自那时以来,已发表了40多项研究,这些研究中有1100多例患者接受了SILC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号