...
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry >Recognition of mental disorders and beliefs about treatment and outcome: findings from an Australian national survey of mental health literacy and stigma.
【24h】

Recognition of mental disorders and beliefs about treatment and outcome: findings from an Australian national survey of mental health literacy and stigma.

机译:对精神障碍的认识以及对治疗和结果的信念:澳大利亚全国心理健康素养和污名化调查的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to carry out a national survey in order to assess recognition and beliefs about treatment for affective disorders, anxiety disorders and schizophrenia/psychosis. METHOD: In 2011, telephone interviews were carried out with 6019 Australians aged 15 or over. Participants were presented with a case vignette describing either depression, depression with suicidal thoughts, early schizophrenia, chronic schizophrenia, social phobia or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Questions were asked about what was wrong with the person, the likely helpfulness of a broad range of interventions and the likely outcomes for the person with and without appropriate treatment. RESULTS: Rates of recognition of depression were relatively high, with almost 75% of respondents using the correct label. Rates of recognition for the schizophrenia vignettes and PTSD were similar, with around one third of respondents using the correct labels. Only 9.2% of respondents were able to correctly label social phobia. Respondents gave the highest helpfulness ratings to GPs, counsellors, antidepressants, antipsychotics (for schizophrenia) and lifestyle interventions such as physical activity, relaxation and getting out more. Respondents were generally optimistic about recovery following treatment, although relapse was seen as likely. CONCLUSIONS: While Australians' beliefs about effective medications and interventions for mental disorders have moved closer to those of health professionals since surveys conducted in 1995 and 2003/4, there is still potential for mental health literacy gains in the areas of recognition and treatment beliefs for mental disorders. This is particularly the case for schizophrenia and anxiety disorders, which are less well recognized and, in the case of social phobia, generally perceived as having less need for professional help.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是进行一项全国调查,以评估对情感障碍,焦虑症和精神分裂症/精神病治疗的认识和信念。方法:2011年,对6019名15岁以上的澳大利亚人进行了电话采访。与会人员会看到一个病例插图,描述抑郁症,具有自杀念头的抑郁症,早期精神分裂症,慢性精神分裂症,社交恐惧症或创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。询问以下问题:该人出了什么问题,广泛干预措施的可能帮助以及是否接受适当治疗的人可能得到的结果。结果:抑郁症的识别率相对较高,将近75%的受访者使用正确的标签。精神分裂症小插图和PTSD的识别率相似,大约三分之一的受访者使用正确的标签。只有9.2%的受访者能够正确标记社交恐惧症。受访者对全科医生,辅导员,抗抑郁药,抗精神病药(精神分裂症)和生活方式干预(例如体育活动,放松和锻炼更多)的评价最高。尽管被认为有复发的可能,但受访者通常对治疗后的恢复感到乐观。结论:自1995年和2003/4年进行调查以来,尽管澳大利亚人对精神障碍的有效药物和干预的观念已接近卫生专业人员的观念,但在认知和治疗观念方面,仍然有可能提高心理健康素养精神错乱。对于精神分裂症和焦虑症而言尤其如此,这些精神分裂症和焦虑症的认识较差,并且在社交恐惧症的情况下,通常被认为较少需要专业帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号