首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of hospice & palliative medicine >Unlocking the closed door: Arguments for open access hospice
【24h】

Unlocking the closed door: Arguments for open access hospice

机译:解锁关门:开放式临终关怀的争论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The traditional view of standard hospice (SH) care is that once begun, the doorway toward curative and other forms of nonpalliative treatment is irrevocably locked. We will argue that such a traditional view needs to be reassessed in light of new arguments and data regarding access to these avenues of treatment. We will argue that patients should be supported in their transition from SH to open access hospice (OAH). Open access hospice should be available to all patients because of ethical arguments, patient satisfaction arguments, and costs of care arguments. More randomized controlled research trials need to be performed to study the impact of OAH versus SH. This research should focus on patient satisfaction, cost, and survival.
机译:传统的标准临终关怀(SH)护理的传统观点是,一旦开始,治愈性和其他形式的非姑息治疗的大门就被不可撤销地锁定。我们将认为,需要根据有关获得这些治疗途径的新论据和数据重新评估这种传统观点。我们将认为,应支持患者从SH过渡到开放式临终关怀(OAH)。由于伦理学上的争论,患者满意度的争论和医疗费用的争论,所有患者都应有开放式临终关怀医院。需要进行更多的随机对照研究试验来研究OAH与SH的影响。该研究应关注患者的满意度,成本和生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号