首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of geriatric psychiatry: official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry >Systematic Review of Cognitive Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Late-Life Depression
【24h】

Systematic Review of Cognitive Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Late-Life Depression

机译:对抽搐治疗对晚年抑郁症认知作用的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: Late-life depression (LLD) is known to negatively impact cognition even after remission of mood symptoms. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and newer nonconvulsive electrical and magnetic brain stimulation interventions have been shown to have cognitive effects in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders. Methods: This review systematically assessed the effects of ECT on cognition in LLD. EMBASE, Ovid Medline, and PsycINFO were systematically searched through June 2015. The search was limited to publications from peer-reviewed journals in the English language. Results: A total of 5,154 publications was identified; 318 were reviewed in full text, of which 39 publications related to ECT were included. We focused this review only on ECT because evidence on newer interventions was deemed insufficient for a systematic review. This literature suggests increased rates of interictal and postictal cognitive decline with ECT but no long-term (i.e., 6 months or longer) deleterious effects on cognition. Instead, long-term cognitive outcomes with ECT have been reported as either not changed or improved. This literature favors nondominant unilateral ECT over bilateral ECT for cognition. Conclusion: Published literature on brain stimulation interventions in LLD is mainly limited to ECT. This literature suggests that deleterious effects of ECT in LLD are limited and transient, with better cognitive outcomes with unilateral ECT. There is not enough evidence to fully characterize long-term deleterious effects of ECT or effects of newer brain stimulation techniques on cognition in LLD.
机译:目的:即使在缓解情绪症状后,人们也认为晚生活抑郁症(LLD)会对认知产生负面影响。电惊厥疗法(ECT)和较新的非惊厥性电和磁脑刺激干预措施已被证明对神经精神疾病患者具有认知作用。方法:本综述系统评价了ECT对LLD认知的影响。截至2015年6月,系统地搜索了EMBASE,Ovid Medline和PsycINFO。搜索仅限于经过同行评审的英语期刊的出版物。结果:共鉴定到5154种出版物;全文阅读了318篇,其中包括与ECT相关的39种出版物。我们之所以仅将评论集中在ECT上,是因为有关新干预措施的证据被认为不足以进行系统的审查。该文献表明,ECT引起的发作间和发作后认知下降的速率增加,但是对认知没有长期(即6个月或更长时间)的有害影响。取而代之的是,据报道,ECT的长期认知结果并未改变或改善。该文献主张非显性单侧ECT优于双侧ECT。结论:有关LLD的脑刺激干预的文献主要限于ECT。这项文献表明,ECT对LLD的有害作用是有限的和短暂的,单侧ECT具有更好的认知效果。没有足够的证据来充分表征ECT的长期有害作用或较新的脑刺激技术对LLD认知的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号