首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychiatric research >Challenges in comparing the acute cognitive outcomes of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) vs. electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in major depression: A systematic review
【24h】

Challenges in comparing the acute cognitive outcomes of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) vs. electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in major depression: A systematic review

机译:比较大萧条电耦合(HF-RTMS)与电耦合治疗(ECT)的急性认知结果比较急性认知结果的挑战:系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The present study aimed to systematically compare the cognitive outcomes of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in head-to-head studies with major depression (MDD) patients. A systematic literature search identified six studies with 219 MDD patients that were too heterogeneous to reliably detect meaningful differences in acute cognitive outcomes after ECT vs. HF-rTMS. Cognitive effects of brain stimulation vary depending on the timeframe and methods of assessment, stimulation parameters, and maintenance treatment. Thus, acute and longer-term differences in cognitive outcomes both need to be investigated at precisely defined timeframes and with similar instruments assessing comparable functions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究旨在系统地将高频重复血管磁刺激(HF-RTMS)和电耦合治疗(ECT)的认知结果与主要抑郁(MDD)患者进行了高频重复经颅磁刺激(HF-RTMS)和电耦合治疗(ECT)。 系统文献搜索确定了六项研究,219名MDD患者过于异质,不能在与HF-RTMS术后急性认知结果中可靠地检测有意义的差异。 脑刺激的认知效果根据评估,刺激参数和维护治疗的时间框架和方法而变化。 因此,需要在精确地定义的时间帧和类似仪器中进行认知结果的急性和长期差异,并具有评估可比功能的类似仪器。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号