...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Gastroenterology >Pharmacologic prophylaxis alone is not adequate to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis
【24h】

Pharmacologic prophylaxis alone is not adequate to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis

机译:单独进行药物预防不足以预防ERCP后胰腺炎

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) remains the most common complication following ERCP. Although once considered unpredictable, understanding patient and procedure-related risk factors, and measures such as pancreatic stent placement and pharmacoprophylaxis have been shown to substantially decrease the risk of PEP. In this issue of the Journal, the role of pharmacoprophylaxis is explored in a study comparing rectal indomethacin plus sublingual nitrates vs. rectal indomethacin alone. While showing improved efficacy, dual pharmacoprophylaxis does not appear adequate to obviate the importance of technique-related variables and pancreatic stents. Rather, a comprehensive approach is likely to be the most efficacious strategy to reduce PEP.
机译:ERCP后胰腺炎(PEP)仍然是ERCP之后最常见的并发症。尽管曾经被认为是不可预测的,但了解患者和手术相关的危险因素,以及胰支架置入和药物预防等措施已被证明可以大大降低PEP的风险。在本期《华尔街日报》中,比较直肠消炎痛加舌下硝酸盐与单独使用直肠消炎痛的研究比较了药物预防的作用。虽然显示出更高的疗效,但双重药物预防似乎不足以消除技术相关变量和胰腺支架的重要性。相反,一种综合的方法可能是减少PEP的最有效策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号